Centre Withdraws Order For Cuts In Udaipur Information Movie After Delhi Excessive Courtroom Queries, Will Resolve On Certification Afresh

The Delhi Excessive Courtroom questioned the Centre’s authority to order six cuts to the movie ‘Udaipur Information: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Homicide’ underneath the Cinematograph Act. On August 1, the Centre withdrew its reduce order and agreed to re-decide on the movie’s certification by August 6. The Courtroom directed producers to satisfy with the federal government on August 4. It emphasised that its concern was the authorized train of revisional powers, not the movie’s deserves, noting the Centre’s actions appeared like impermissible instructions. The movie’s launch, initially June 11, is now August 8 as a result of this certification dispute.

Case in opposition to producer for forging Malayalam actor Nivin Pauly’s signature to get rights of movie’s title

A case has been registered in opposition to Malayalam movie producer P. A. Shamnas for allegedly forging actor Nivin Pauly’s signature to amass the title rights for “Motion Hero Biju-2” from the Kerala Movie Chamber. Pauly alleges Shamnas used a cast doc, bypassing a 2023 settlement that granted all movie rights to Pauly’s manufacturing firm, Pauly Junior. An FIR was filed in opposition to Shamnas for forgery. This follows an earlier criticism by Shamnas in opposition to Pauly regarding movie rights. The dispute entails the sequel to the profitable 2016 movie “Motion Hero Biju.”

CBFC calls for main edits in Son of Sardaar 2

The CBFC demanded vital edits for Ajay Devgn’s movie “Son of Sardaar 2.” References to Chinese language President Xi Jinping had been muted, “merchandise” modified to “madam,” and “kuttey ki tarah” to “bahut buri tarah,” amongst different dialogue revisions. Regardless of these, the movie secured a U/A 13+ score with a 2h 27m 32s runtime.

Vijay Sethupathi Denies Sexual Misconduct Allegations, Information Cybercrime Complain

Tamil actor Vijay Sethupathi has vehemently denied latest sexual misconduct allegations circulating on social media and has filed a proper criticism with the Cybercrime Wing of the Chennai Police. The allegations, which surfaced just lately, claimed inappropriate conduct. Sethupathi’s authorized workforce said that these claims are baseless, defamatory, and a part of a malicious marketing campaign aimed toward tarnishing his popularity. The actor has sought authorized motion in opposition to these liable for spreading the false accusations on-line, emphasizing his dedication to transparency and justice. The police have initiated an investigation into the matter based mostly on his criticism. This transfer underscores the rising use of authorized recourse by public figures in opposition to on-line defamation and unverified claims.

Ruchi Gujjar slaps producer Karan Singh at movie premiere, recordsdata police criticism alleging Rs 23 lakh fraud

Mannequin-turned-actress Ruchi Gujjar allegedly slapped producer Karan Singh Chauhan with a sandal on the premiere of his movie “So Lengthy Valley”. An FIR was filed by Gujjar, accusing Chauhan and his workforce of defrauding her of ₹23 lakh. She claims the cash was for a promised tv function, revenue sharing, and on-screen credit score that by no means materialized. Gujjar now faces assault fees, whereas her lawyer plans a counter-complaint. The movie’s director, Man Singh, dismissed the altercation as a “publicity stunt.”

Girls Movie Circuit recordsdata criticism with SWA in regards to the lack of honest pay

The Girls Movie Circuit (WFC) has filed a criticism with the Screenwriters Affiliation (SWA) concerning the extreme underpayment of writers, significantly for “micro dramas” and short-form digital content material. WFC founder Sulagna Chatterjee highlighted that writers are paid as little as Rs 1,000-Rs 2,000 per episode, considerably under SWA’s 2019 Minimal Fundamental Contract charge of Rs 11-12 lakh for movie initiatives. The criticism factors out that present SWA mandates primarily apply to movies, leaving digital codecs unregulated and prone to exploitation. WFC urges SWA to ascertain clear charge playing cards for all digital content material to make sure honest compensation and deal with this loophole.

HC pulls up CBFC for delay in certifying movie on Yogi Adityanath

The Bombay Excessive Courtroom has questioned the CBFC over its delay in certifying “Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi,” a movie purportedly based mostly on Yogi Adityanath. Producers Samrat Cinematics challenged the refusal, noting that the Cinematograph Act mandates processing inside every week and screening inside 15 days. They alleged arbitrary delay, claiming the CBFC demanded an “misguided and extraneous” no-objection certificates from the Chief Minister’s Workplace. The movie, initially set for an August 1 launch, was stalled for over a month. The Courtroom noticed the censor board can’t indefinitely delay a choice, particularly after charging precedence charges.

Delhi Excessive Courtroom Grants Interim Aid To Ching’s, Restrains Native Producer From Utilizing ‘Schezwan Chutney’ Mark

The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has granted interim reduction to Capital Meals (Ching’s Secret) in opposition to Pitambari Merchandise, restraining them from utilizing the trademark “Schezwan Chutney.” The Courtroom discovered that Ching’s is the registered proprietor of this phrase mark and likewise holds copyright in its product’s inventive packaging. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora noticed a prima facie case for infringement, emphasizing that the injunction particularly covers using the “Schezwan Chutney” mark, not the commerce costume of Pitambari’s merchandise. The defendant was selling its “Schezwan Chutney” on social media. This determination reinforces trademark safety for established manufacturers even when phrases might sound descriptive. The case might be additional heard in December.

Order right here

GLC was ours earlier than you: Justice Gautam Patel slams Principal for discover in opposition to podcast run by alumni

Former Bombay Excessive Courtroom Justice Gautam Patel has strongly condemned Authorities Legislation Faculty (GLC), Mumbai’s principal for a public discover warning authorized motion in opposition to “GLC Legislation and Lore,” a podcast run by alumni. The discover, issued July 31, 2025, disassociated the school from the podcast for unauthorized use of “GLC” in its identify. Justice Patel, an alumnus himself, despatched a scathing letter on August 1, emphasizing GLC’s legacy belongs to its alumni and calling the discover “mean-spirited” and “disgraceful” for threatening college students. He additionally supplied authorized help to the scholars if the school pursues motion. The principal clarified the discover was a precautionary measure for model safety.

CCI rejects ADIF’s criticism in opposition to Google Advertisements insurance policies

The Competitors Fee of India (CCI) has rejected a criticism by the Alliance of Digital India Basis (ADIF) in opposition to Google’s promoting insurance policies. ADIF alleged Google abused its dominant place by imposing unfair circumstances, together with banning third-party tech help advertisements, limiting mobile-only ‘Name Advertisements’, non-transparent advert rating, and permitting trademark bidding. Google defended its insurance policies as pro-consumer and pro-competition. The CCI dismissed the criticism underneath Part 26(2A) of the Competitors Act, citing that the problems had already been adjudicated in earlier instances (Matrimony.com and Vishal Gupta), and no new materials circumstances had been introduced. This determination emphasizes the precept of res judicata in competitors legislation, avoiding reinvestigation of beforehand settled issues.

Delhi HC Recognises ‘Nutella’ as Properly-Identified Trademark in Trademark Infringement Go well with Filed by Ferrero

The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has declared “Nutella” a well known trademark underneath Part 2(zg) of the Commerce Marks Act, 1999, in a go well with filed by Ferrero. Justice Saurabh Banerjee famous Nutella’s world recognition, together with by WIPO and INTA. The ruling got here after Ferrero found M.B. Enterprises manufacturing counterfeit Nutella merchandise, which the courtroom deemed a mala fide try to take advantage of Nutella’s goodwill. Highlighting public well being dangers from misleading edible objects, the courtroom decreed the go well with in Ferrero’s favor, granting a everlasting injunction and damages. This determination reinforces sturdy safety for well known manufacturers.

Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia College for trademark infringement

Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia College for trademark infringement and breach of contract. The lawsuit, filed July 23, 2025, in Oregon federal courtroom, alleges the college’s merchandise, significantly clothes that includes solely the phrase “Columbia” in a shiny blue, violates a 2023 settlement. This pact mandated the college use a recognizable insignia, its mascot, “college,” an instructional division identify, or its founding 12 months alongside “Columbia” on attire. Columbia Sportswear claims this breach causes client confusion and seeks to halt gross sales, recall merchandise, donate merchandise, and obtain triple damages.

CoStar sues Zillow for alleged copyright infringement of 1000’s of images

CoStar Group has sued Zillow in New York federal courtroom for alleged widespread copyright infringement of over 46,000 of CoStar’s actual property images. CoStar claims Zillow revealed its watermarked photos greater than 250,000 instances, extending to companion websites like Redfin. CEO Andy Florance expressed outrage over Zillow’s alleged theft, citing CoStar’s funding in its picture database. The lawsuit additionally references Zillow’s previous legal responsibility in an identical case with VHT, Inc. CoStar estimates potential damages exceeding one billion {dollars}, probably making it one in all historical past’s largest picture infringement instances.

Sony Sues Tencent for Copyright Infringement, Says Its Recreation Is ‘Slavish Clone’ of Horizon Franchise

Sony has sued Tencent for copyright infringement, alleging Tencent’s upcoming recreation, “Mild of Motiram,” is a “slavish clone” of Sony’s Horizon franchise. Sony claims “Mild of Motiram” copies Horizon’s gameplay, story, and inventive components, doubtlessly complicated prospects. The lawsuit follows Sony’s refusal of Tencent’s 2024 collaboration provide for a brand new Horizon recreation. “Mild of Motiram,” introduced in November 2024, options “Mechanimals” and a post-apocalyptic setting, drawing quick comparability. Sony seeks financial damages and an injunction, confirming Horizon gross sales exceed 38 million copies globally.

‘Cheat software program’ will not be copyright infringing, however advert blockers could also be, German courtroom guidelines

The German Federal Courtroom of Justice (BGH) has dominated that cheat software program is usually not copyright infringing if it solely modifies short-term knowledge in a recreation’s RAM with out altering the unique program code. This follows a CJEU ruling (Sony v. Datel). Relating to ad-blockers, the BGH’s stance is much less definitive, however earlier German courtroom choices, together with an April 2018 BGH ruling, have usually discovered ad-blocking software program like Adblock Plus to be permissible and never in violation of competitors legislation or copyright, as they don’t unlawfully copy or modify copyrighted software program however quite impression how content material is displayed. The copyright implications of advert blockers are nonetheless underneath ongoing authorized scrutiny, with some instances stayed pending CJEU choices.

Apple Sues Apple Cinemas for Trademark Infringement

Apple Inc. has sued Apple Cinemas, a Massachusetts movie show chain, for trademark infringement. Apple argues the cinema’s identify confuses customers, particularly given Apple’s enlargement into leisure providers like Apple TV+ and movie manufacturing. The lawsuit, filed in opposition to a series working since 2016, seeks an injunction to drive rebranding and unspecified damages. This motion displays Apple’s aggressive model safety technique and will set a precedent for trademark scope throughout industries, doubtlessly influencing naming conventions within the leisure sector.

SC Rejects Ilaiyaraaja’s Plea to Shift Copyright Case to Madras HC

The Supreme Courtroom has dismissed a plea by Ilaiyaraaja Music N Administration Pvt Ltd (IMMPL) looking for switch of a copyright infringement go well with filed by Sony Music from the Bombay Excessive Courtroom to the Madras Excessive Courtroom. IMMPL had argued {that a} parallel case regarding 310 of the 536 musical works in query was already pending within the Madras Excessive Courtroom since 2014, and that it operated solely out of Chennai. Nevertheless, the Supreme Courtroom held that Sony’s go well with had been filed in Bombay previous to IMMPL’s Madras petition and refused to permit the switch, thereby allowing the Bombay Excessive Courtroom proceedings to proceed.

Trade Teams Increase Alarm Over Proposed Telecom Cybersecurity Guidelines

Main business associations together with IAMAI, NASSCOM, BIF, and CUTS Worldwide have raised critical considerations over the Division of Telecommunications’ draft telecom cybersecurity guidelines. The proposed amendments, they argue, considerably increase the regulatory scope to cowl non-telecom entities comparable to OTT platforms, retailers, and even academic establishments underneath the brand new “Telecommunication Identifier Consumer Entities” class. Key objections embrace the chance of regulatory overreach, potential battle with present IT legal guidelines, lack of satisfactory privateness safeguards, and substantial compliance prices—significantly because of the proposed Cell Quantity Verification system that might cost entities as much as ₹3 per transaction. Trade our bodies warn that these measures could hinder innovation, disproportionately impression MSMEs, and complicate India’s digital ecosystem.