Tamil Movie Producers Council proposes profit-sharing mannequin for actors
The Tamil Movie Producers Council has launched a brand new working module recommending that actors shift from heavy upfront charges to a profit-sharing remuneration mannequin. That is positioned as a structural reform for an business combating escalating manufacturing prices and inconsistent box-office returns. The Council argues that linking compensation to precise income will encourage monetary self-discipline, scale back funds overruns, and align incentives throughout stakeholders. The proposal has created vital debate, particularly amongst main actors’ groups who depend on mounted pay buildings. If applied, this may occasionally set a precedent for different regional movie industries grappling with related economics.
Sameer Wankhede argues “satire defence not absolute” in Delhi Excessive Courtroom
In proceedings regarding the “Bads of Bollywood” present, Sameer Wankhede contended that creators can’t depend on satire as a blanket defence when the content material targets a particular particular person, particularly a public servant. He submitted that satirical expression should nonetheless function inside authorized limits and can’t be used to masks reputational hurt or alleged defamation. The dispute highlights the stress between creative freedom, investigative content material, and private rights of officers concerned in high-profile instances. The Courtroom might want to consider the road between reliable critique and focused character portrayal. The result may affect the boundaries of documentary-style content material in India.
Madras Excessive Courtroom restrains launch of Kumki 2 till December 2
The Madras Excessive Courtroom granted an interim injunction in opposition to the producers of Kumki 2, restraining the movie’s launch till 2 December after a financier claimed unpaid dues of INR 1.50 crore plus curiosity. The courtroom discovered a prima facie case and held that the stability of comfort favoured the financier, citing threat of irreparable loss if the movie launched earlier than the declare was decided. The dispute was filed below Part 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, underscoring how film-financing points more and more set off arbitration and interim reduction. The order highlights that even when a censor certificates is in place, contractual/monetary claims can override launch plans.
PIL seeks ban on Desiya Thalaivar (biopic of Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar)
A public curiosity litigation has been filed looking for the ban of the biopic “Desiya Thalaivar” on the bottom that it allegedly presents factually incorrect narratives about former CM Okay Kamaraj and will incite caste tensions between the Nadar and Thevar communities. The Madras Excessive Courtroom has directed the Tamil Nadu authorities to file its response and has adjourned listening to by every week. The petitioner argued scenes within the movie depict demeaning and unverified claims about Kamaraj’s election‐associated property switch, thereby defaming his legacy and stirring communal discord.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom declines to carry injunction on movie title use in Bro Code title dispute
In a trademark declare by the beverage firm Indospirit Drinks Personal Restricted, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom refused to grant interim reduction to the film-maker looking for to make use of the title “Bro Code”, noting that staying the judgment would quantity to deciding the attraction prematurely. The beverage firm claimed the title infringed its registered mark used for alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks and that the similar use may hurt its model and confuse customers. The Courtroom thus restrained the manufacturing home from utilizing “Bro Code” in promotion and distribution.
Kerala Excessive Courtroom directs Haal makers to resubmit movie to Central Board of Movie Certification after mandated cuts
The Kerala Excessive Courtroom, presided by Justice V.G. Arun, ordered the makers of the Malayalam movie Haal — produced by JVJ Productions and directed by Muhammed Rafeek (Veera) — to resubmit the movie to the CBFC after making two specified excisions, together with a scene depicting beef biryani and one involving courtroom proceedings. Upon resubmission, the CBFC is required to challenge a contemporary certificates inside two weeks. The courtroom additionally criticised the CBFC’s preliminary demand for six removals, observing that film-certification should be judged from the perspective of an “abnormal, prudent particular person” reasonably than an “oversensitive” viewpoint.
76 % of India’s prime influencers flout disclosure norms: Promoting Requirements Council of India
The Promoting Requirements Council of India (ASCI) has discovered that 76 % of India’s main digital influencers, as per the Forbes record, did not disclose their industrial tie-ups through the April–September 2025 interval. The report additionally signifies that digital platforms flagged 97 % of those violative ads, with Meta Platforms accountable for almost 79 % of the reported violations and Google LLC contributing below 5 %. Nearly all of points got here from sectors equivalent to offshore/unlawful betting, private care, healthcare, meals and schooling.
CELEBRITY & PERSONALITY RIGHTS
- Delhi Excessive Courtroom protects Jaya Bachchan’s character rights
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom restrained unauthorised industrial use of Jaya Bachchan’s picture, likeness and different identifiable attributes. The choice displays the judiciary’s growing willingness to recognise broad-spectrum character and publicity rights, even with no codified statute. The Courtroom held that exploiting a celeb’s persona with out consent unfairly capitalises on their fame and goodwill. This final result builds on latest Indian jurisprudence increasing protectable superstar pursuits within the digital financial system. The ruling might also information manufacturers and advertisers on consent necessities for celebrity-linked promotions.
- Rapper RBX sues Spotify over alleged AI bots and pretend streaming exercise
Rapper RBX filed a lawsuit in California alleging that Spotify inflated streaming numbers utilizing AI-driven bots, which distorted engagement metrics and in the end impacted artist royalties. The swimsuit additionally implicates broader issues round transparency in algorithmic techniques utilized by music platforms. If confirmed, it may expose main vulnerabilities in royalty accounting and digital fraud detection. The case brings renewed scrutiny to AI manipulation inside the music business at a time when regulators are already grappling with AI-generated content material. Spotify’s response is anticipated to form the narrative on platform accountability.
- Influencer & entrepreneur Raj Shamani seeks courtroom order to curb unauthorised use of his title and likeness
Raj Shamani has filed a petition within the Delhi Excessive Courtroom, by way of his counsel, looking for safety of his character rights by requesting the elimination of AI-generated content material and different media on social platforms and web sites that use his title, persona or logos with out his consent. The listening to is scheduled earlier than Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora on 17 November 2025.
- Madras Excessive Courtroom reserves order in personality-rights swimsuit by superstar chef Madhampatty T Rangaraj in opposition to costume designer Pleasure Crizildaa
The Madras Excessive Courtroom has reserved its judgment within the petition filed by chef-actor Madhampatty T Rangaraj looking for to restrain Pleasure Crizildaa from making allegedly defamatory social-media posts that he claims impair his skilled fame and character rights. Crizildaa, in her defence, contends the posts mirror her lived expertise and are protected below free speech, and denies exploiting Rangaraj’s character commercially. The courtroom has directed the events to file written submissions by 14 November.
AI, COPYRIGHT & PIRACY
- Meta accused of coaching LLaMA AI fashions on pirated books
A public allegation claims that Meta’s LLaMA fashions had been educated on datasets containing pirated, copyright-protected books with out permission. This accusation reignites the worldwide debate on dataset provenance, licensing obligations, and transparency necessities for big AI fashions. If validated, it may expose Meta to copyright legal responsibility, just like lawsuits in opposition to different AI builders. The controversy additionally underscores the hole between technological capabilities and authorized frameworks governing AI coaching information. Policymakers at the moment are below stress to craft clearer guidelines for AI coaching compliance.
- MIB invitations business inputs to bolster nationwide anti-piracy technique
The Ministry of Data & Broadcasting has issued an open name for stakeholder feedback inside 20 days to form a strengthened anti-piracy regime. The session focuses on digital piracy, illicit streaming, enforcement mechanisms and potential statutory updates. This comes at a time when the content material business continues to report vital losses because of organised digital infringement networks. The train goals to create a extra coordinated response between the federal government, platforms, and rights-holders. Business participation is anticipated to affect the subsequent section of regulatory tightening.
- Delhi Excessive Courtroom injuncts Patanjali chyawanprash commercial
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom restrained Patanjali from airing an commercial that referred to rival chyawanprash manufacturers as “dhoka” (misleading), holding that such messaging quantities to impermissible denigration of competing items. Whereas comparative promoting is allowed, the Courtroom emphasised that it can’t cross into unfair disparagement. The ruling reinforces the requirements governing claims, innuendo, and hyperbole in industrial advertisements. The choice comes in opposition to the backdrop of elevated scrutiny of Patanjali’s promoting practices. Manufacturers are reminded to keep away from unfavourable generalisations about opponents.
- Bombay Excessive Courtroom stays FIR in opposition to Flipkart in Shemaroo copyright dispute
Flipkart secured a keep on an FIR lodged by Shemaroo alleging unauthorised internet hosting of copyrighted movies. The Courtroom noticed that felony prosecution in copyright issues should meet the next threshold and can’t be triggered mechanically. This interim reduction gives respiration room for the platform whereas the Courtroom examines points referring to middleman legal responsibility. The dispute underscores ongoing uncertainty round platform accountability for third-party content material. The ultimate final result may have wider implications for e-commerce market legal responsibility frameworks.
- Delhi Excessive Courtroom restrains rogue websites from streaming India-vs-South Africa & New Zealand sequence in favour of JioStar
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of JioStar, which holds unique world digital and tv media rights from the Board of Management for Cricket in India (BCCI) for numerous occasions together with the India-South Africa and upcoming India-New Zealand cricket sequence. The Courtroom noticed that unauthorised streaming by rogue apps and web sites undermines JioStar’s funding and causes irreparable hurt — therefore it restrained them from internet hosting, streaming, reproducing or distributing the mentioned matches through the interval.
TECH POLICY & AI REGULATION
- India operationalises digital private information safety guidelines
The Digital Private Knowledge Safety Act, 2023 (“DPDP Act”) has now been paired with supporting guidelines (the Digital Private Knowledge Safety Guidelines, 2025) which mark the operationalisation of India’s first standalone digital personal-data regulation. The foundations impose strict obligations on organisations (information fiduciaries) dealing with digital private information in India. For instance, limiting assortment strictly to what’s needed for outlined functions, requiring verifiable parental consent for kids’s information, and mandating quick breach-notification to customers and regulators. The framework applies to entities inside India and abroad companies providing items or companies to Indian information principals or profiling them whereas in India.
- Tech business teams urge MeitY to refine AI content material guidelines
Main business associations have urged MeitY to revise its draft AI tips to make sure higher alignment with world regulatory frameworks. They stress the necessity to keep away from overly restrictive content material moderation necessities that might stifle innovation and cross-border collaboration. The teams suggest risk-tiered obligations, proportional compliance, and clearer definitions for AI-generated content material. Their submission displays a rising demand for a balanced regulatory method that protects customers with out throttling rising markets. The federal government is anticipated to launch a revised model of its AI framework within the coming months.
- MeitY releases SOP for tackling non-consensual intimate content material
The brand new SOP gives a structured course of for platforms to detect, report, and quickly take away non-consensual intimate content material (NCIC). It outlines compliance timelines, sufferer help mechanisms, and coordination pathways with regulation enforcement. The rules symbolize India’s growing concentrate on digital security, particularly for girls and minors. Platforms now face stronger expectations relating to proactive monitoring and consumer redress. This SOP might kind the idea of future legislative reforms below the IT Guidelines.
- German Courtroom guidelines in opposition to OpenAI on AI use of music lyrics
A German courtroom held that coaching or producing outputs from copyrighted music lyrics with out permission constitutes infringement. The choice marks a major setback for OpenAI and probably different AI builders utilizing music content material in coaching datasets. The ruling alerts the EU’s stricter stance on defending copyrighted works within the AI period. It might additionally embolden rights-holders to pursue related claims in different jurisdictions. Compliance with copyright licensing in AI coaching is more likely to grow to be a significant worldwide challenge.
TRADEMARK & PASSING OFF
- Delhi Excessive Courtroom grants reduction to Dream11; refers matter to mediation
The Excessive Courtroom granted interim safety to Dream11 in a trademark dispute involving alleged infringement by a competing platform. After assessing the prima facie energy of Dream11’s mark and the potential for consumer confusion, the Courtroom opted to refer the matter to mediation. This displays the judiciary’s growing inclination to push industrial IP disputes towards different decision mechanisms. The order ensures interim stability for Dream11’s branding pending decision. Mediation may result in a quicker and extra commercially wise settlement.
- Bombay Excessive Courtroom restrains The New Indian Specific from utilizing the mark outdoors South India
In a long-running territorial dispute, the Courtroom held that The New Indian Specific can’t use its mark outdoors the agreed southern states, recognising the potential for shopper confusion with The Indian Specific. The injunction is predicated on contractual preparations and trademark rights that outline territorial exclusivity. The Courtroom discovered prima facie infringement when the mark appeared in areas past the permitted zone. The choice reinforces the significance of geographic agreements in media branding. This ruling might form future media home growth methods.
- Supreme Courtroom revives Crocs’ passing-off fits; dismisses pleas by Bata & Liberty
The Supreme Courtroom upheld orders reviving Crocs’ passing-off fits in opposition to home footwear firms equivalent to Bata and Liberty, clearing the trail for full trial. Crocs alleges that the defendants copied its distinctive commerce costume, together with the long-lasting clog design. The Apex Courtroom’s refusal to quash proceedings demonstrates its willingness to permit detailed factual examination in commerce costume disputes. This final result strengthens model homeowners’ potential to guard non-traditional marks and product shapes. It additionally alerts stricter judicial scrutiny of imitation in aggressive markets.
- Bombay Excessive Courtroom grants interim injunction to Metro Manufacturers Restricted, restrains use of “METRO Footwear” mark
The Bombay Excessive Courtroom has granted interim reduction in favour of Metro Manufacturers, restraining a retail retailer from utilizing the mark “Metro Footwear”, on the idea that it bore an similar or deceptively related resemblance to the registered “METRO” mark utilized by Metro Manufacturers since 1955. The Courtroom discovered that the defendant’s use would probably trigger confusion and hurt the plaintiff’s goodwill, particularly given its long-standing market presence and registration of the mark since December 1972.