Supreme Courtroom Units Tips for Portrayal of Individuals with Disabilities in Media
Within the current case of Nipun Malhotra vs. Sony Footage Movies India Personal Restricted & Ors., heard on July 08, 2024, the Supreme Courtroom bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala addressed points associated to the portrayal of individuals with disabilities in visible media. The Courtroom emphasised the influence of stereotypes on discrimination and elementary rights, distinguishing between “Incapacity Humor” that challenges typical perceptions and “Disabling Humor” that demeans people with disabilities.
Nipun Malhotra contested the portrayal of individuals with disabilities within the movie ‘Aankh Micholi’, arguing it violated constitutional rights and related authorized statutes. Regardless of objections, the movie acquired unrestricted certification from the Central Board of Movie Certification (CBFC).
In its judgment, the Supreme Courtroom upheld the movie’s certification and refused to simply accept sure suggestions of the appellant. Nevertheless, the Courtroom offered tips for future portrayals of individuals with disabilities in visible media. These tips embody avoiding derogatory phrases, precisely representing medical situations, reflecting numerous experiences, and refraining from perpetuating myths or stereotypes.
Case: Nipun Malhotra vs. Sony Footage Movies India Personal Restricted & Ors.
Case Quotation: Civil Enchantment No. 7230 of 2024
You may learn extra about it right here.
(Detailed article on this case to be revealed quickly)
Authorized Dispute Over ‘Nadaprabhu Kempegowda’ Title in Kannada Cinema
In April, TS Nagabharana and the workforce behind the movie ‘Nadaprabhu Kempegowda’, that includes Dhananjaya, obtained a keep order in opposition to the makers of one other movie titled ‘Dharmaveeru Naadaprabhu Kempegowda‘, directed by Dinesh Baboo. This authorized motion pertained to the usage of the title in biopics about Kempe Gowda, Bengaluru’s founder.
Following the disclosing of TS Nagabharana’s movie on June 21, producers of the movie Dharmaveeru responded by reportedly submitting a police grievance, claiming possession of the title.
Director Pannaga Bharana, overseeing the movie ‘Nadaprabhu Kempegowda’, has highlighted that the title ‘Nadaprabhu Kempegowda’ was owned by his father, director TS Nagabharana, for over a decade. He had diligently renewed the registration yearly in compliance with laws. It’s the different workforce that has violated these guidelines by saying their movie with out registering the title and including an unauthorized prefix. Nevertheless, the producer of Dharamveeru acknowledged that nobody has a copyright over title of the movie, and the events are actually awaiting the court docket resolution.
You may learn extra about this right here.
TRAI Proposes Interoperable STBs and NCF Reforms, Enhances Shopper Flexibility in Broadcasting
TRAI has beneficial making set-top packing containers (STBs) interoperable for DTH and cable TV subscribers, permitting simpler switching between operators with out altering STBs. Moreover, TRAI abolished the Community Capability Charge (NCF) ceilings, enabling suppliers to differ costs based mostly on channels, areas, and buyer classes for market-driven equity. Service suppliers should transparently publish these costs and report back to TRAI. Regardless of trade resistance, TRAI considers interoperable STBs fascinating, proposing potential adoption with out mandate by the Ministry of Info and Broadcasting.
Moreover, TRAI mandated Prasar Bharati to transform DD Free Dish to an encrypted, addressable system to reinforce viewing high quality, fight piracy, and observe subscribers. TRAI urged Prasar Bharati to undertake interoperable STBs to facilitate seamless client alternative and get rid of the necessity for frequent STB modifications.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Supreme Courtroom Directs Stakeholder Conferences on Promoting Rules
The Supreme Courtroom has instructed the Centre to convene conferences with numerous media stakeholders to deal with points associated to promoting laws. This follows earlier orders requiring advertisers to submit self-declarations on the character of their commercials. The Ministry of Info and Broadcasting, which is able to set up these conferences, is required to submit its suggestions inside three weeks. A Bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta emphasised that the commercial trade shouldn’t undergo, and instructed the Ministry to have interaction with extra events to know and resolve their challenges. It was acknowledged that the Ministry of Shopper Affairs will also be a part of the “mind storming” train.
This directive got here in response to impleadment functions from a number of associations, together with the Promoting Businesses Affiliation and the Web and Cell Affiliation of India.
Beforehand, the Supreme Courtroom had mandated advertisers to submit self-declaration kinds confirming compliance with cable TV guidelines and promoting codes earlier than airing advertisements, and directed the institution of a portal for such submissions.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Gaurav Gupta’s Authorized Battle In opposition to Counterfeit Luxurious Merchandise
Delhi-based dressmaker Gaurav Gupta has taken important authorized motion in opposition to counterfeiters, submitting 9 circumstances within the Delhi Excessive Courtroom. Gupta, famend for his designs worn by celebrities like Beyoncé and Cardi B, seeks Rs 2 crore in damages from every counterfeiter and goals for restraining orders. Gupta famous that counterfeiters have been imitating his signature sculpting methods.
Most circumstances contain Delhi-based events, with one every in Mumbai and Punjab. Gupta’s first go well with was filed in 2017, with extra fits from 2021 to 2024. Three circumstances have been decreed in his favor, whereas interim injunctions are in place for the remaining six. The court docket has acknowledged the IP rights of Mirror Sculpt Pvt Ltd (RSPL), Gupta’s holding firm, and ordered defendants to stop counterfeit manufacturing and on-line exercise. In a single occasion, defendants from Delhi, Jalandhar, and Amritsar paid Rs 10 lakh in damages and litigation prices to RSPL.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Gaming Studios deal with a letter to PM Modi, looking for clear distinction between Video Video games and Actual-Cash Video games
A bunch of 70 online game studios and esports corporations, together with Dot9 Video games, Outlier Video games, and SuperGaming, has written to the Prime Minister’s Workplace (PMO) and the Ministry of Info and Broadcasting. They search a coverage that distinguishes video video games from real-money video games (RMG). The gaming trade studios advocate for separate classes for video video games and RMG in Indian coverage for truthful regulation.
It was acknowledged that within the letter that “Corporations making video video games have been topic to a number of present trigger notices and tax raids, and banks and cost gateway corporations have been denying providers as properly”.
The studios suggest the Info and Broadcasting Ministry be the nodal company for video video games, with a devoted AVGC-XR wing led by a joint secretary-level official. AVGC-XR stands for Animation, Visible Results, Gaming, Comics, and Prolonged Actuality.
You may learn extra about this right here.
X Corp Defends Authenticity of Movies of Rajat Sharma abusing Congress spokesperson
X Corp, previously Twitter, knowledgeable the Delhi Excessive Courtroom that the movies posted by Congress leaders exhibiting IndiaTV chief Rajat Sharma allegedly abusing spokesperson Ragini Nayak are “not edited or pretend”. The uncooked footage, out there on IndiaTV’s YouTube channel, confirms Sharma’s use of the phrases he denied. The court docket upheld its order requiring the removing of the tweets however allowed Congress leaders the correct to contest Sharma’s claims.
The alleged incident occurred throughout a June 4 present discussing election outcomes. Nayak accused Sharma of “doublespeak” and objected to his assertion downplaying Congress’s seat good points, main Sharma to reportedly muttering an insult. Congress filed a grievance, and Sharma filed a defamation go well with looking for ₹100 crore in damages. X Corp emphasised that the video clearly captures Sharma muttering one thing, which is central to his defamation go well with.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Secures Endemol’s Dues Amid MX Participant Sale
Endemol Shine India Restricted, identified for actuality reveals like ‘MasterChef’ and ‘Bigg Boss,’ has filed a petition in opposition to MX Media and Leisure PTE Ltd (“MX”), the proprietor of MX Participant, within the Delhi Excessive Courtroom underneath Part 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. Endemol claims non-payment of dues for producing ‘Kumite 1 Warrior Hunt’ underneath a Line Manufacturing Facilitation Settlement. Regardless of Endemol fulfilling its contractual obligations and MX monetizing this system, no settlement was reached, main Endemol to invoke arbitration.
With MX present process liquidation proceedings in Singapore, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom directed MX to retain Rs. 2.65 crore from its asset sale proceeds to cowl Endemol’s principal quantity owed.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Supreme Courtroom Stays Karnataka Excessive Courtroom Order In opposition to Energy TV
In a current resolution, the Supreme Courtroom intervened to remain a Karnataka Excessive Courtroom order that had restrained the printed of Kannada information channel Energy TV noting that that is nothing however a ‘sheer political vendetta‘. The Excessive Courtroom had briefly halted the channel’s operations till July 9, citing an expired license as grounds. Nevertheless, the Supreme Courtroom deemed this motion as politically motivated vendetta. The controversy arose following intensive protection by Energy TV of alleged intercourse scandal allegations involving JD(S) leaders Prajwal and Suraj Revanna, prompting authorized actions by senior IPS officer Dr B R Ravikanthegowda and JDS chief MLC HM Ramesh Gowda and his spouse Dr A Ramya Ramesh.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Points John Doe Order to Defend Razorpay from Monetary Fraud
Razorpay, a funds and banking platform, has obtained a John Doe Order from the Delhi Excessive Courtroom to guard its model identification and prospects from monetary fraud. The order mandates social media platforms to droop accounts infringing on Razorpay’s logos and conducting fraudulent actions, whereas area identify registrars should block related domains, financial institution accounts, and UPI IDs.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Calcutta Excessive Courtroom Resolves Dabur-Dhruv Rathee Dispute Over YouTube Video
In a case introduced by Dabur India Restricted in opposition to Dhruv Rathee over a YouTube video referencing its ‘Actual’ product, the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom, led by Justice Krishna Rao, disposed of the go well with based mostly on a settlement between the events.
The dispute arose from a video uploaded by Dhruv Rathee in February 2023, which Dabur claimed disparaged its fruit merchandise. Following court docket orders and negotiations, Dhruv Rathee agreed to change the video by blurring or utilizing generic fruit juice packaging. Each events concluded that persevering with the go well with wouldn’t be useful, resulting in its disposal underneath the phrases of their settlement.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Courtroom Halts Sale of E-book on Rana Kapoor Amid Defamation Claims
In a current growth, a Delhi court docket has issued an interim injunction in opposition to the e book “Sure Man: The Untold Story of Rana Kapoor,” authored by journalist Pavan C Lall. District Decide Naresh Kumar Laka of Tis Hazari Courtroom dominated in favor of Rana Kapoor, discovering that the e book doubtlessly harms his status with content material that isn’t wholly factual. The injunction prevents the sale, distribution, or circulation of the e book and can stay efficient till the conclusion of Kapoor’s defamation lawsuit in opposition to HarperCollins and Lall.
The court docket additionally mandated the removing of particular articles from The Print and prohibited the defendants from making additional defamatory statements about Kapoor. HarperCollins argued that the statements within the e book weren’t defamatory, citing Kapoor’s public determine standing and the absence of proof demonstrating precise hurt to his status attributable to the e book.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Federal Courtroom of Canada to Determine whether or not AI may be thought-about as authors
The Federal Courtroom of Canada is presently contemplating a case difficult whether or not synthetic intelligence may be acknowledged as authors underneath Canada’s copyright regulation. Led by the College of Ottawa’s Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Web Coverage and Public Curiosity Clinic, the case goals to determine that solely people may be thought-about authors underneath the regulation, amidst the rising manufacturing of AI-generated content material.
You may learn extra about this right here.
US Decide Guidelines In opposition to Launch of Nashville Faculty Shooter’s Writings
In a current ruling, Chancery Courtroom Decide I’Ashea Myles determined that writings and different works created by Audrey Hale, the perpetrator of a tragic capturing at a Nashville elementary faculty, can’t be made public. Hale, a former pupil who was killed by police after the incident, had her property rights transferred to the victims’ households by her dad and mom. The households argued efficiently in court docket that they maintain the copyright to Hale’s creations, together with writings, journals, artwork, pictures, and movies, thereby stopping their launch underneath the Tennessee Public Information Act. Myles acknowledged this argument as a novel utility of federal copyright regulation, in the end upholding the dad and mom’ group’s declare to regulate entry to those supplies.
You may learn extra about this right here.