Takedown of ‘Sarke Chunar Teri Sarke’ Amid Authorized Complaints and NHRC Discover
The promotional marketing campaign for KD: The Satan encountered a setback after the makers eliminated the tune ‘Sarke Chunar Teri Sarke’ and its Kannada model ‘Sarse Ninna Seraga Sarse’ from YouTube and different streaming platforms. The takedown adopted authorized complaints and public criticism alleging that the tune contained obscene and sexually suggestive content material. In a subsequent improvement, the Nationwide Human Rights Fee issued a discover in relation to the matter.
The controversy arose after a criticism was filed by Vineet Jindal earlier than the Delhi Police cyber cell in search of motion towards individuals related to the tune, together with Rageeb Alam, Prem, Arjun Janya, and Mangli. It was alleged that the content material could entice legal responsibility beneath Part 294 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, together with related provisions of the Safety of Kids from Sexual Offences Act and the Info Expertise Act, 2000. A criticism was additionally filed earlier than the Central Board of Movie Certification. Following this, the tune was made unavailable on YouTube, the place it had been accessible till March 16, 2026, and no official response has been issued by the makers up to now.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Directs Implementation of Accessibility Measures in Movies
Whereas contemplating a petition in regards to the absence of accessibility options for individuals with disabilities, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom directed the Ministry of Info and Broadcasting, the Ministry of Electronics and Info Expertise, and the Central Board of Movie Certification to implement specified recommendations regarding such options. The petition sought instructions to make sure that the movie Pushpa 2: The Rule is launched with accessibility options, together with audio description and same-language closed captioning or Indian Signal Language, throughout theatres, OTT platforms, and different media codecs, in keeping with the accessibility pointers issued on March 15, 2024.
The Single Bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav directed that sure recommendations be carried out by the Ministry of Info and Broadcasting and the Ministry of Electronics and Info Expertise, whereas the Central Board of Movie Certification was directed to think about the remaining recommendations. The petitioner, showing in particular person, highlighted the absence of any unbiased mechanism enabling individuals with disabilities to determine movies providing such options, thereby affecting their potential to make knowledgeable viewing decisions. The Courtroom took notice of urged measures together with disclosure of accessibility options previous to ticket reserving, entry to such options via related functions, availability of technical help particulars, and a mechanism to make sure accessibility-compliant platforms. The matter has been listed for additional consideration on Might 7, 2026.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Supreme Courtroom Quashes Copyright Case Towards Sujoy Ghosh
The Supreme Courtroom of India quashed the prison proceedings and summoning orders issued towards Sujoy Ghosh in relation to alleged copyright infringement in regards to the movie Kahaani 2: Durga Rani Singh. The Bench comprising Justice P. S. Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe put aside the orders of the Chief Judicial Justice of the Peace, Hazaribagh, and the Jharkhand Excessive Courtroom, and quashed the pending criticism case. The matter arose from a Particular Go away Petition difficult the Excessive Courtroom’s refusal to intrude with the prison proceedings.
The criticism had been filed by Umesh Prasad Mehta alleging that the movie’s script was copied from his work titled “Sabak,” which he claimed to have shared with Ghosh in 2015 for a advice associated to copyright registration. The Justice of the Peace had taken cognizance beneath Part 63 of the Copyright Act and issued summons, which the Excessive Courtroom declined to quash, observing that the allegations disclosed a prima facie case and that such points must be examined at trial. Ghosh had challenged the proceedings as baseless and invoked the inherent jurisdiction of the Excessive Courtroom; nevertheless, the Supreme Courtroom put aside the summoning order and the prison proceedings in entirety, thereby permitting the petition.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Case Title: Sujoy Ghosh v. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Quotation: Particular Go away to Attraction (Crl.) No(s). 9452/2025
Film Can Be Flop Too, No Dishonest Offence Simply As a result of Movie Funding Didn’t Return Revenue: Supreme Courtroom
The Supreme Courtroom of India quashed prison proceedings beneath Part 420 of the Indian Penal Code towards V. Ganesan, holding that simply because a film did not generate revenue doesn’t, by itself, set up dishonest intention from the inception. The Bench comprising Justice P. S. Narasimha and Justice Manoj Misra put aside the order of the Madras Excessive Courtroom to the extent it declined to quash proceedings beneath Part 420 IPC, and held that the dispute disclosed solely a civil explanation for motion.
The Courtroom famous that the complainant had invested in a movie undertaking in expectation of profit-sharing, the movie was accomplished and launched, and there have been no allegations of earnings being generated. The Courtroom noticed that movie manufacturing is a high-risk exercise and that an settlement to share earnings inherently entails the danger of no returns. It additional held that dishonour of post-dated cheques, issued in direction of reimbursement of an current obligation, doesn’t by itself quantity to dishonest, although it could entice separate cures. Accordingly, the Courtroom concluded that the allegations didn’t disclose dishonest intention from the outset and quashed the prison proceedings.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Case Title: V. Ganesan v. State Rep. by the Sub Inspector of Police and One other
Quotation: 2026 INSC 265
Kerala Excessive Courtroom Hears Problem to Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2’
The producer of The Kerala Story 2: Goes Past objected to a plea earlier than the Kerala Excessive Courtroom difficult the certification granted to the movie on the bottom of alleged defamation of the State. Through the listening to, the Courtroom noticed that the difficulty raised by the petitioners was “in all probability real” and orally indicated that the rights within the movie ought to not be launched till the matter is heard additional.
In response, the producer’s counsel submitted that the pleas are within the nature of public curiosity and that the petitioners wouldn’t have any particular person grievance. It was argued that the problem relies on an assertion that the dignity of the petitioners is affected as a result of alleged impression on the repute of Kerala, and that such a declare will not be sustainable because the State doesn’t possess an unbiased dignity separate from that of the nation. The matter was adjourned and is scheduled to be heard additional.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Parliament Debate on ‘KD: The Satan’ Music Amid Obscenity Row
The controversy surrounding the tune ‘Sarke Chunar Teri Sarke’ from KD: The Satan was raised in Parliament, with Anand Bhadoria highlighting considerations over vulgar content material on OTT platforms and social media. In response, Ashwini Vaishnaw said {that a} ban had already been imposed on the tune and reiterated that freedom of speech is topic to affordable restrictions in keeping with societal and cultural issues. The controversy pertains to the Kannada monitor ‘Sarse Ninna Serage Sarse’, written by Prem, who issued an apology following public backlash.
The Hindi model, written by Abdul Rageem, gained consideration after its launch that includes Sanjay Dutt and Nora Fatehi, with allegations that the lyrics had been sexually suggestive. The Karnataka State Fee for Ladies additionally sought motion, elevating considerations that such content material could encourage eve-teasing and impression girls adversely. It urged the Karnataka Movie Chamber of Commerce to make sure that objectionable content material is averted, and requested the Central Board of Movie Certification to require deletion or modification of such parts. The CBFC, nevertheless, clarified that it had not acquired any utility for certification of the tune and that digital content material falls outdoors its regulatory scope, directing queries to the platform and the makers.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Bengaluru Courtroom Grants Injunction to Defend ‘Ustad Bhagath Singh’
Forward of the theatrical launch of Ustad Bhagath Singh, producer Mythri Film Makers obtained an ex parte short-term injunction from the Bengaluru Metropolis Civil and Periods Courtroom restraining the circulation of allegedly false, malicious, defamatory, or derogatory content material regarding the movie throughout digital and media platforms. The order, handed in a swimsuit towards varied intermediaries together with YouTube LLC, Large Tree Leisure Pvt Ltd, X Corp., Google India Personal Restricted, IMDb.com Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc., directs them to chorus from publishing or sharing such content material till the subsequent listening to, which is scheduled for April 27, 2026.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Seeks Readability in Sonakshi Sinha’s Persona Rights Go well with
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom directed Sonakshi Sinha to file a transparent, defendant-wise desk of allegedly infringing URLs in her swimsuit towards AI-based platforms for misuse of her persona rights, noting lack of readability within the materials positioned on report. Justice Jyoti Singh, whereas listening to the interim utility, additionally permitted submitting of delicate materials in a sealed cowl and indicated that an interim order for defense of the actor’s persona rights could be handed, whereas limiting reliefs to legally recognised measures and acknowledging the technical position of intermediaries corresponding to area registrars.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Gautam Gambhir Strikes Delhi Excessive Courtroom Over AI Deepfakes and Persona Rights
Gautam Gambhir has instituted a civil swimsuit earlier than the Delhi Excessive Courtroom in search of safety of his persona and publicity rights towards alleged digital impersonation, AI-generated deepfakes, and unauthorised business exploitation. The swimsuit highlights a surge in fabricated content material throughout social media platforms, the place AI instruments corresponding to face-swapping and voice-cloning had been used to create movies falsely depicting him making statements, together with a purported resignation announcement and feedback on senior cricketers, which acquired vital on-line traction.
The swimsuit additional raises considerations over unauthorised business use of his title and likeness, together with sale of merchandise on e-commerce platforms with out consent. It’s alleged that such actions kind a part of a coordinated misuse of his id, prompting the request for complete authorized safety and applicable instructions towards the involved platforms and entities concerned.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Election Fee to Resolve Destiny of ‘Jana Nayagan’ Amid Mannequin Code of Conduct
The discharge of Jana Nayagan has encountered a contemporary hurdle, with the Election Fee of India inspecting whether or not the movie may be cleared through the operation of the Mannequin Code of Conduct. The difficulty arises as Vijay, who performs the lead, can be the top of a political social gathering contesting the upcoming Tamil Nadu Meeting elections. The Fee has termed the matter a “new scenario” and is contemplating whether or not a movie that includes an lively political determine requires scrutiny through the election interval.
The movie, which has already confronted certification delays earlier than the Central Board of Movie Certification, was referred to a revising committee after objections to sure scenes. With the Mannequin Code of Conduct in drive till completion of the election course of, the matter now lies on the intersection of movie certification and election regulation, and the ultimate clearance is more likely to depend upon the Election Fee’s resolution, making a pre-election launch unsure.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Restrains Switch of Broadcast Rights in Legends League Dispute
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom restrained Absolute Legends Sports activities Personal Restricted from creating or transferring any third-party rights in relation to the Legends League Cricket Grasp T20 event, in a dispute with JioStar India Pvt. Ltd.. The Courtroom, whereas listening to a petition beneath the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, held that allowing such switch would defeat the subject material of the dispute, and particularly restrained any proposed switch of rights to Bluegod Leisure Restricted pending decision of the dispute.
The order was handed by Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, who noticed that interim safety was essential to safeguard JioStar’s claims arising from a previous settlement for broadcast and business exploitation of the event. JioStar has additionally sought additional instructions to restrain broadcasting of the event on tv and digital platforms, together with deposit of sure quantities and creation of an escrow mechanism for revenues, which stay to be thought of.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Madras Excessive Courtroom Grants Injunction Towards Unauthorised Broadcast of ‘Jab Khuli Kitab’
The Madras Excessive Courtroom granted an ad-interim injunction restraining unauthorised broadcasting of the movie Jab Khuli Kitab, holding that preventive measures are essential to keep away from irreparable hurt to copyright house owners. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy restrained a number of web service suppliers and cable operators, whereas directing the plaintiff, Applause Leisure Personal Restricted, to offer indemnity contemplating the vast scope of the aid, and ordered that the interim safety will stay in drive till April 6, 2026.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Madras Excessive Courtroom Clarifies Restricted Copyright Rights in ‘Roja’ Dispute
The Madras Excessive Courtroom dismissed appeals filed by Lahari Recording Firm in a copyright dispute in regards to the Telugu dubbed model of Roja, holding that Lahari didn’t possess satellite tv for pc broadcasting rights and couldn’t restrain its telecast. The Division Bench of Justice C. V. Karthikeyan and Justice Ok. Kumaresh Babu noticed that Lahari’s rights had been restricted to dubbing and specified modes of exploitation beneath its settlement with Kavithalayaa Productions, and couldn’t be expanded to incorporate satellite tv for pc rights.
The Courtroom additional held that copyright in movies includes distinct rights, corresponding to theatrical and satellite tv for pc broadcasting rights, which have to be individually assigned. It famous that Lahari had exceeded its contractual rights by granting video cassette rights to a 3rd social gathering and, within the absence of satellite tv for pc rights, couldn’t declare infringement or damages towards telecast by Jain Tv. Accordingly, the Courtroom concluded that Lahari was not entitled to any injunction or compensation, reinforcing that copyright claims are strictly confined to the rights expressly granted beneath an settlement.
You may learn extra about it right here.
Case Title: Lahari Recording Co. P. Ltd. v. Jain Tv & Ors. (Mala Publicity Service P Ltd)
Quotation: 2026: MHC: 942.
