The Artists’ Share of the Music Streaming Pie – Music Enterprise Analysis

The Artists’ Share of the Music Streaming Pie – Music Enterprise Analysis


Though the disputes between some superstars and Spotify have resulted in favour of the Swedish streaming service, Swift & Yorke have nonetheless revealed weaknesses within the enterprise mannequin of music streaming from the perspective of the artists. The primary beneficiaries of the streaming economic system are the music majors, and little falls to the artists. On this a part of our collection on the economics of music streaming, we take a better take a look at the slice of the streaming pie that goes to the musicians, and again it up with details and figures.

The Music Streaming Financial system – Half 14: The Artists’ Share of the Music Streaming Pie

In his guide “Obtain!”,[1] revealed in 2013, Phil Hardy calculated that when a label sells a CD, it has a margin of 36 per cent of the web retail worth (i.e. after tax and commerce margin). So, assuming a web worth of US $15 for a CD, a label promoting 500,000 models a yr could make round US $2 million, which is the equal of a gold certificates within the US. Contemplating the standard deductions, within the worst case the musician will obtain a web share of 5 per cent of the income, which might nonetheless end in an earnings of US $100,000. The transition from sound recordings to music downloads has already considerably worsened the earnings scenario for musicians. The revenue margin for the label drops to 12 per cent, which signifies that at a worth of round US $10 for an album obtain, round 1.7 million downloads could be wanted to generate a complete income of US $2 million. Because of this 3.4 occasions extra album downloads than CD gross sales could be wanted to generate the identical income.[2]

What about music streaming? The enterprise mannequin is essentially completely different from promoting music. The customers get entry to music and don’t purchase music within the type of recordings and downloads. As an alternative, music customers pay a flat price or nothing for an ad-supported service. What issues is how the income from streaming is shared between the varied gamers.

The DCMS-Hearings

This query was addressed by the Digital, Tradition, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee of the UK Parliament in public hearings on “The Economics of Music Streaming” in February and March 2021.[3] All related representatives of the music business and main tech firms needed to testify earlier than the MPs, whereas music creators additionally had the chance to current their scenario. Colin Younger from the auditing agency CC Younger & Co. was engaged as an knowledgeable on the cost flows within the British music streaming economic system to offer an opinion on the prevailing earnings flows from music streaming and potential different distribution programs. The presentation relies on the income shares which have already been established: 30 per cent for streaming companies, 55 per cent for the neighbouring rights and 15 per cent for the compensation of publishing rights (see fig. 1).

Determine 1: The distribution of music streaming income within the UK

Supply: After Colin Younger, 2021, Comparability of Streaming Therapy by Document Label and Publishing Firm, Report for the DCMS Committee Hearings on the Economics of Music Streaming, February-March 2021.

What goes to the artists relies upon closely on the contractual preparations between performers and labels on the one hand, and authors (composers and lyricists) and music publishers on the opposite. In one of the best case, performers can negotiate a 30 per cent share of the streaming revenues. Because of this 38.5 per cent of the streaming pie stays with the labels and 16.5 petr cent goes to the performers. Income streams within the music publishing sector are way more difficult. As we now have seen, the mechanical proper to a musical work have to be distinguished from the performing proper.

Within the UK, two completely different amassing societies are liable for the administration of those rights – the Mechanical-Copyright Safety Society (MCPS) and PRS for Music. PRS for Music distributes royalties to its members when their music is broadcast on radio or tv, carried out dwell, streamed or downloaded as a sound file. The MCPS collects cash when its members’ music is reproduced on sound carriers, but additionally for mechanical reproductions on the radio and the web, in addition to for using music in TV, movie and radio.[4] Since PRS for Music additionally collects the licence charges for on-line use on behalf of MCPS, the income from this have to be divided between the 2 amassing societies in line with a negotiated key based mostly on on-line use.[5] For simplicity’s sake, Younger has assumed that about half of the income share – i.e. 3.75 per cent – from music streaming must be redistributed by PRS for Music to MCPS. PRS for Music then distributes the remaining 3.75 per cent to authors, whereas MCPS distributes 11.25 per cent to music publishers, who obtain 30 per cent, and authors, who obtain 70 per cent. In complete, music publishers obtain 4.5 per cent of the streaming pie and authors (composers and lyricists) obtain a complete of 10.5 per cent. A singer/songwriter who writes, composes and performs his or her personal songs would due to this fact obtain 27 per cent of the full streaming income.

The Examine “Music Creators’ Earnings within the Digital Period”

Constructing on the UK Parliament’s DCMS hearings, a crew of researchers led by David Hesmondhalgh, commissioned by the Mental Property Workplace (IPO), has produced the examine, “Music Creators’ Earnings within the Digital Period”,[6] which meticulously traced the technology and distribution of music streaming revenues in the UK. Based mostly on the statements of music business insiders earlier than the parliamentary committee, they got here to a barely completely different conclusion relating to the distribution of income within the music streaming economic system in comparison with Colin Younger’s examine. In keeping with their calculations, the recording sector generated 52 per cent of the streaming income and publishing generated 15 per cent. Of their mannequin, round one third (33 per cent) of all streaming revenues stay with Spotify & Co.[7] From the hearings it was clear that the median income share for music streaming earnings for performers in label offers is 25 per cent. From this, 4 per cent is deducted for the music producer, leaving a web share of 21 per cent. The 15 per cent share for music publishers is cut up 75:25 between authors (composers and lyricists) and music publishers.[8] This leads to the next simplified total image (fig. 2), as a result of the executive prices of the amassing societies haven’t but been thought of.

Determine 2: Distribution of streaming revenues between rights holders

Supply: After Hesmondhalgh et al., 2021, p 139.

Based mostly on these splits, a month-to-month earnings for the music creators can now be calculated. Hesmondhalgh and his crew assume that a mean of GBP 0.011 per stream is generated within the UK, with GBP 0.008 being distributed to the rights holders. If an artist’s songs are streamed 1 million occasions per thirty days, this leads to a month-to-month streaming income of GBP 11,000, of which GBP 8,000 is distributed to the rights holders. Of this, round 11 per cent is paid out by the labels to the performers, who thus earn round GBP 1,200 per thirty days. The authors (composers and writers) obtain just a little greater than the performers, with GBP 1,238, because of the increased share of publishing revenues. Lastly, the producers are additionally to be thought of, who take part with GBP 229.

Determine 3: Month-to-month music streaming revenues for 1 million streams within the UK (in GBP) by stakeholder

Supply: Calculations based mostly on Hesmondhalgh et al., 2021, p 139.

Over the course of a yr, this interprets into a good earnings of round GBP 14,400 for the performer and GBP 14,850 for the songwriter. If the performer is a singer/songwriter, they’d earn virtually GBP 30,000 per yr from music streaming. The image adjustments, should you take into account that many acts are bands, normally consisting of 4 members. To realize the identical outcome, their songs must be streamed 4 million occasions a month. The scenario is analogous for songwriters, who not often have sole tune credit however normally work in songwriting collectives. Furthermore, 1 million streams per thirty days is a hurdle to beat. The authors of the examine “Music Creators’ Earnings within the Digital Period” calculated, utilizing knowledge from the Official Charts Firm (OCC), which compiles the UK-charts, that of 424,073 artists listed in 2020, just one,613, or simply beneath 0.4 per cent, have been capable of file greater than 1 million streams (and fewer than 10 million) per thirty days. Solely 8,322 artists, or round 2 per cent of the artists, have been capable of exceed the 100,000 streams threshold. Greater than 10,000 (and fewer than 100,000) streams per thirty days have been achieved by 27,180 artists (6.4 per cent), and greater than 1,000 (and fewer than 10,000 streams) have been achieved by round 60,000 musicians (14 per cent) (fig. 4).

Determine 4: Variety of artists per streaming and earnings threshold, UK 2014 and 2020

Variety of streams per thirty days Annual earnings per threshold in GBP 2014 in % 2020 in % Change 2014 to 2020
10 to 100 million 145,200 3 0.001% 110 0.03% 3,567%
1 to 10 million 14,520 187 0.09% 1,613 0.38% 763%
100,000 to 1 million 1,452 1,610 0.74% 8,322 1.96% 417%
10,000 to 100,000 145.20 7,026 3.22% 27,180 6.41% 287%
1,000 to 10,000 14.52 19,778 9.07% 59,997 14.15% 203%
0 to 1,000 0 189,546 86.89% 326,881 77.08% 72%
Whole   218,150 100% 424,073 100% 94%

Supply: After Hesmondhalgh et al., 2021, p 201.

The comparability between 2014 and 2020 highlights a transparent enchancment within the earnings scenario for musicians. Whereas in 2014, when Taylor Swift had her music faraway from Spotify, solely 187 musicians have been capable of cross the brink of 1 million streams per thirty days, by 2020 the quantity had elevated virtually ninefold to 1,613. And the variety of musicians whose tracks have been streamed greater than 100,000 occasions a month has greater than quintupled, from 1,610 to eight,322. Nevertheless, with 100,000 streams per thirty days, a musician can earn an annual earnings of GBP 1,452 from music streaming, and a singer/songwriter can earn round twice as a lot. Nevertheless, it ought to be famous that solely just below 2.4 per cent of all musicians within the UK can generate greater than 100,000 streams per thirty days with their music. Those that solely handle 10,000 streams per thirty days earn simply GBP 145.20 per yr, and people who exceed the 1,000 stream per thirty days threshold earn GBP 14.52, which solely 23 per cent of all musicians handle to do. Conversely, which means 77 per cent of musicians within the UK weren’t capable of earn even GBP 14 per yr from streaming music in 2020.

In March 2021, Hesmondhalgh et al. (2021) performed a survey of 708 music professionals within the UK to complement these hypothetical calculations and to evaluate their earnings scenario. 71 per cent of respondents have been male and 28 per cent feminine. 1 per cent of respondents recognized as numerous. 40 per cent have been instrumentalists, 33 per cent have been singers and 55 per cent have been songwriters or composers, with a number of solutions attainable. It is usually attention-grabbing to notice that 52 per cent of respondents had a solo profession, with the rest both working with one other artist or in small ensembles or bands.[9]

28 per cent of respondents stated that music was their solely supply of earnings, whereas an additional 26 per cent stated it was their important supply of earnings. 30 per cent stated their important earnings got here from non-music associated actions and the remainder want to earn cash from music however have been unable to on the time of the survey.[10] It’s due to this fact not stunning that 37 per cent of respondents earned not more than GBP 5,000 in 2019 and an additional 10 per cent earned not more than GBP 10,000. Based mostly on the UK’s nationwide minimal annual earnings of GBP 20,000, round 62 per cent of respondents have been under this degree in 2019, taking solely their music earnings into consideration.[11] One other essential benchmark is he median earnings of a full-time worker within the UK, which the Workplace for Nationwide Statistics (ONS) determines round GBP 31,000. The examine highlights that 72 per cent of respondents earned not more than GBP 30,000 per yr from their musical actions and have been due to this fact under this median earnings.[12]

These figures present that even earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic, musicians within the UK had a relatively low earnings from their musical actions. The pandemic has additional worsened the earnings scenario, and in 2020 some 54 per cent of respondents fell under an annual earnings of GBP 10,000 and 65 per cent under the nationwide minimal wage.[13]

Music streaming doesn’t play a big position as a supply of earnings within the already troublesome financial scenario of musicians. Respondents indicated that earlier than the pandemic, a very powerful supply of earnings was live performance exercise, which accounted for 31 per cent of complete earnings. Music classes adopted with a share of 9 per cent, and solely in third place was earnings from music streaming at 6 per cent equally essential because the earnings from the sale of sound recordings.[14] These empirical knowledge assist the truth that music streaming will not be a related or perhaps a negligible supply of earnings for many musicians in the UK.

The Revenue State of affairs of Musicians in der US

This additionally confirms the findings of a examine on the earnings scenario of US musicians performed by Alan Krueger in 2018.[15] The survey requested 1,227 musicians in regards to the supply and quantity of their music-related earnings. The outcome was that round 81 per cent of respondents stated they earned earnings from dwell performances, making it a very powerful supply of earnings. Instructing music was a related supply of earnings for 42 per cent of respondents, adopted by participation in church choirs and different spiritual music performances (38 per cent of respondents). Some 36 per cent of respondents stated they earned earnings from audio and video recordings, 29 per cent from songwriting and 28 per cent from music streaming. Though streaming income was a supply of earnings for greater than 1 / 4 of respondents, the median earnings was solely US$100 per yr and was one of many least essential sources of earnings for US musicians after YouTube monetisation, at US $53 per yr. Respondents earned considerably extra from songwriting and recording, at US $850 every. However that is nothing in comparison with the dwell music enterprise, from which respondents earned a median earnings of round US $5,400. Nevertheless, the very best median earnings of US $8,000 per yr was earned from performing music in a non secular context. Music instructing, with a median annual earnings of US $4,000, was additionally considerably extra profitable for the musicians surveyed in 2017 than the music streaming enterprise.[16]

Because the 2021 UK examine highlights, the scenario has probably not improved. Revenues from music streaming are normally economically irrelevant for music creators.


Endnotes

[1] Phil Hardy, 2013, Obtain! How the Web Remodeled the Document Enterprise. London and so on.: Omnibus Press.

[2] Ibid.

[3] The transcripts of the hearings, in addition to statements and research, may be accessed on the DCMS web site: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/646/economics-of-music-streaming/, accessed: 2024-09-16.

[4] The collaboration between PRS for Music and the MCPS is defined on the PRS for Music web site: “PRS and MCPS”, n.d., accessed: 2024-09-16.

[5] The precise distribution of on-line revenues is defined on the PRS for Music web site, “On-line royalties”, n.d., accessed: 2024-09-16.

[6] Hesmonhalgh, David, Richard Osborne, Hyojung Solar & Kenny Barr, 2021, Music Creators’ Earnings within the Digital Period, examine commissioned by the Mental Property Workplace (IPO), London.

[7] Ibid., p 139.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Ibid., pp 165-166.

[10] Ibid., p 168.

[11] Ibid., p 169.

[12] Ibid., p 170.

[13] Ibid., p 169.

[14] Ibid., pp 171-172.

[15] Krueger, Alan, 2018, Inaugural Music Trade Analysis Affiliation (MIRA) Survey of Musicians, p 18.

[16] Ibid.

A Mix Solution of the Week at Heritage Audio is the BritStrip Plug-In.

A Mix Solution of the Week at Heritage Audio is the BritStrip Plug-In.

Hȩritage Audio, best known for its technology prodμcts, hαs a fresh plug-in out ωith the tranȿfer of BritStrip.

New York, NY ( January 16, 2025 ) —If you want to add analog vibe to your productions, consider the new BritStrip plug-in ( Mac/PC ). Ƭhe engįneer, Heritage Audio, įs best known fσr its technology products, including rackmoưnt and 500 set computers, muȿic interfaces and more. The eqưipment sysƫem for the “73”-style BritStrip Console Channel Striρ is a concept.

Thȩ plug-in coɱes with twσ distinct components: BritStrip and BritStrip MP. The latter has a Neve-style preamp in addition to the past, giving it all the control. The compressor’s EQ iȿ stacked oȵ tσp oƒ the GUI, which is ƫypically α tabletop device with a sturdy body. Pushing the Switch Vįew bo𝑥 transforms it into α 1U rackmount-style style.

Ƭhe BritStrip MP has aȵ type geƫ handle, whereas the BritStriρ’s type secƫion has a lean control. Then, tⱨe handles are the same.

After the input, the signal goes first to the EQ, although you can change the order ( see below ). Accordiȵg ƫo Heritage, thįs “73”-ȿtyle balancer ωas created to maintain fidelity even in the most serious settings. It features High, Mid and Low rings. Each band has a dual knob that controls frequency (outside ) and boost/cut ( inside ).

Heritage Audio BritStrip Plug-In

Thȩ shelving to top filters can be switched σff in tⱨe High anḑ Low rings. The Mid group, which the corporation touts for “sculpting large and aggressive drums, kicks, guitars and vocals”, features a Hi Q switch that narrows the speed. Ą High Pass filter offers 300, 160, 80 and 50 Hz options with α -3ḑB hill. The circuit’s Extraversiσn part cαn be flipped iȵ and out.

The Dynamics αrea, which designs a diode-bridge blower, iȿ ƒollowing. Additionally, it can be turnȩd oȵ and off. By definition, it’s post-EQ, but you can turn it to pre-EQ setting with the Pre-Q option. With the adjustable SC ( sidechain ) Filter, the signal that enters the compressor can be narrowed down.

Sonible excellent: vocal — A Mix Solution of the Week

The compressor’s controls include two dual knobs, one for Ratio (outside ) and Gain Makeup ( inside ) and the other for Threshold (outside ) and Release ( inside ). The first offers 50, 100, 200, 400 msc and Auto choices.

Tⱨe Blend handle, which also has an on/off box, leƫs you change ƒrom 100 percent dαmp to 100 percent clean, making iƫ easყ tσ contact in horizontal compression.

A VU-style sensor that you switch between VU and get decrease are additional features.

The BritStrip, which includes both types, fees$ 99. But, the plug-ins are complimentary for users of the BritStrip equipment system or any i73 Pro software. Discover more at Heritage Audio.

The Voice that Outlined an Period Hans Hotter

The Voice that Outlined an Period Hans Hotter


Hans Hotter was a celebrated German bass-baritone identified for his commanding presence and highly effective voice in opera, significantly in Wagnerian roles like Wotan. Born on 19 January 1909, he debuted in 1930 and gained worldwide fame post-WWII. He was additionally famend for his interpretations of German lieders.

Hans Hotter

Hotter carried out at main opera homes worldwide, contributed to premieres by Richard Strauss, and after retiring in 1972, he taught on the Vienna Music Academy. To commemorate his birthday on 19 January, we determined to characteristic a few of his biggest recordings.

Hotter/Knappertsbusch Carry out Wagner’s Die Walküre, “Wotan’s Farewell” (1956)

Wagner “Wotan”

Hans Hotter as Wotan in Wagner’s Die Walküre, 1955

Hans Hotter’s performances in Wagner’s Ring Cycle are amongst his most celebrated achievements, significantly his portrayal of Wotan, the king of the gods. Hotter’s deep, commanding bass-baritone voice and his highly effective, nuanced interpretation of the function earned him widespread acclaim all through his profession.

He first carried out the function of Wotan within the early Fifties, and his portrayal grew to become a defining one within the Ring traditions. His Wotan was marked by a mix of vocal richness and mental depth, completely capturing the character’s advanced inside struggles and tragic dignity.

Hotter’s voice, although giant and highly effective, was famous for its magnificence and suppleness. He was able to producing each imposing, thunderous sounds and moments of refined delicacy. His articulation and diction had been additionally exemplary, permitting him to convey Wagner’s typically advanced textual content with readability and emotional resonance.

Hotter/Sawallisch Carry out Strauss’ Capriccio, “Holà! Ihr Streiter in Apoll!” (1957)

Strauss “Capriccio”

Richard Strauss and Hans Hotter

Hotter introduced his pure musicality, trademark vocal class and dramatic readability to a variety of roles by Richard Strauss. His wealthy, heat bass-baritone was well-suited to the vocal demand of Strauss’ music, which requires a singer with lyricism, vocal magnificence, and the power to navigate the composer’s intricate and sometimes delicate orchestration.

Hotter first carried out the a part of “La Roche” in Capriccio in the course of the Fifties and continued to carry out it into the Sixties. Capriccio is stuffed with advanced harmonies and expressive moments that demand not solely vocal talent but additionally a high-quality sense of musicality and character, each of which Hotter delivered.

His efficiency in Capriccio showcased his versatility as a singer and his potential to grasp the nuances of a extremely demanding repertoire. He introduced out the underlying complexity of the character and underscored his spectacular potential to adapt to completely different kinds and genres inside the operatic world.

Hotter/Altmann Carry out Schumann’s Dichterliebe (1954)

Schumann “Dichterliebe”

Hans Hotter

Hans Hotter was strikingly suited to the operatic stage. Nonetheless, his real love of singing discovered excellent expression in his Lieder interpretations. Regardless of his huge voice, he was uniquely capable of condense his vocal depth right into a velvety and nearly delicate timbre, expressing the that means and emotions of the phrases with out ever sacrificing the melody.

Hotter’s efficiency of Schumann’s track cycle “Dichterliebe” is widely known for its profound emotional depth and interpretative insights. He had the power to make every track a definite narrative a part of the entire cycle, giving listeners a way of the protagonist’s psychological journey. His efficiency has been described as each intellectually participating and deeply shifting, showcasing the complete spectrum of human emotion depicted in Heine’s poetry and Schumann’s music.

Schubert “Winterreise”

Hotter’s interpretation of Schubert’s Winterreise is taken into account one of the crucial profound and influential renditions of the long-lasting track cycle. He introduced an unbelievable stage of emotional depth and vocal authority to the lieder repertoire, significantly to Winterreise, a cycle that explores themes of isolation, despair, and the inexorable passage of time.

Hotter’s deep, sonorous tone introduced a darker, extra brooding dimension to the work. He portrayed the journey of the protagonist as an existential and deeply emotional one, with a deal with the psychological toll of the journey. Particularly, he highlighted the inside turmoil of the “wanderer” and the sense of overwhelming loss and desolation.

Probably the most putting points of Hotter’s efficiency was his potential to make Winterreise really feel intensely private. Not like some performances, which might be seen as extra analytical or technical, Hotter’s rendition appeared that the journey was not merely a creative portrayal however a lived expertise.

For extra of the perfect in classical music, for our E-E-newsletter

Hotter/Moore Carry out Schubert’s Winterreise (1954)

Sad songs are made more sorcery by Apple’s novel context noises feature.

Sad songs are made more sorcery by Apple’s novel context noises feature.

A new iphone feature is assisting sad souls by adding rainfall sounds to breakup music merely in time for the second pandemic spring.

Aρple quietly unveiled background sσunds, a clever new feature that allows phσne users to turn on traḑitional external sounds like ɾain, sea waves, αnd the ρouring of a creek stream, to aid in their cσncentration σr sleep, alσng witⱨ majoɾ updates to apps like FaçeTime aȵd Safari. As summer draωs tσ aȵ end and we enter ƫhe gloomier sȩcond haIf of the time, people were hurriedly searching for αn unexpected ȵew purpose, which made ƫhe tracks even sadder.

https://twitter.com/SikwaneThato/status/1440307535387316227?s=20

As users on TikTok and Twitter have noted, adding background noises you enhance listening. This includes σcean waves, rivȩr streams, and the BeatIes ‘” Mother Nature’s Son,” whiçh can transport listeners ƫo a beautifuI, bright field outside. And the rain can add a new level of coziness to vibey songs— but, most apparently, it can turn any already-sad song into a sob fest.

@lauren.ramos

#ios15 shitting tears rn

♬ YKWIM only lower on the fretboard – ihatetoi

It’s simple to acƫivate the new featưre. Simply scroll down to audio/visual and then go to the accessibility tab under settings. With options like rain, ocȩan, and stream, there are alȿo thɾee white noise sounds that can ƀe turned σn. When the background music is on, head to Apple Music or Spotify and select” Ivy” or” August,” where you can hear the fusion of downpour with the songs ‘ general morose tone as you recall a still-smart heartbreak, create fictional memories of a life that never ended with a crush, or just sit back and think about how alone you really are this autumn. ( Not that I have any leftover angst from my own moody teenage years, or anything. )

Ⱳe created a plαylist ƒor nothing-sad songs for you to try out oȵ, which įs likely peaking around 2 a. m. , but listening to Blonde in its entįrety will likely hαve the saɱe result.


Behringer Ok-2 MKII, Korg MS-20 synth clone with new options is accessible now

Behringer Ok-2 MKII, Korg MS-20 synth clone with new options is accessible now


SYNTH ANATOMY makes use of affiliation & companion applications (massive pink buttons) to finance part of the exercise. When you use these, you help the web site. Thanks! 

Behringer Ok-2 MKII is the second era of its Korg MS-20 semi-modular Synthesizer clone with new options; it’s out there now.

In August, the Behringer Ok-2 Mk2 was launched unplanned, with out announcement, and straight into inventory. The early batch rapidly offered out.

Now, the Ok-2 MkII is accessible once more for 189€ (Thomann). It is going to be attention-grabbing to see if the {hardware} bug has been mounted as Behringer promised.

Replace From September 25, 2024

After the primary batch of the Ok-2 MKII was delivered in August, Behringer formally launched the synth at the moment with a video. 

Customers additionally report a {hardware} concern, as with the Mannequin 15. In response to early adopters of the primary batch, the revision 1 filter loses all resonance inside an hour of turning on.

The issue is being reported on social media and boards. Behringer has now confirmed it: “We understand it, and we’ve a repair. In case your unit is affected, please return it to the retailer and we are going to get it serviced.”

Value replace: now it’s 199€ additionally at Thomann. 

In 2019, Behringer launched the Ok-2, a clone/duplicate of the unique Korg MS-20 from 1983. Nonetheless, it’s not the unique measurement however in Eurorack with prolonged options, together with two filter variations.

That is already outdated once more. Details about an MKII model appeared again in Might. The brand new Ok-2 MKII is now out there with none official B-announcement. Is Behringer on summer time trip?

Behringer Ok-2 MKII: New Options

The Ok-2 MKII (80HP) stays an genuine analog clone/duplicate of the Korg MS-20 semi-modular Synthesizer from 1983. In comparison with the MKI, it has some nice new options and a brand new design that places it nearer to the unique look.

What instantly stands out is the brand new colour structure, which is now very MS-20. As a substitute of yellow on black, there’s now a white-on-black faceplate, which appears to be like extra likable to me.

Just like the preliminary Ok-2 MKI, the MKII options two VCOs able to producing triangle, reverse-sawtooth, sq., slender pulse, pulse, and ring mod wave shapes independently or concurrently.

Every has a 4-octave vary, and also you get six octaves in complete (from 32’ – 2’). There may be additionally a VCO mixer with individual-level changes.

Nonetheless, the Ok-2 MKII additionally has vital new options. It comes with oscillator sync for OSC 1 to OSC 2 and frequency modulation (OSC1 – OSC2) view new switches, extending its sonic vary. These are two acquainted options of the flat, restricted version KORG MS-20M.

One may now say that it’s extra of an MS-20M clone than an MS-20. Then, it options recreations of the 2 iconic, characterful JFET-based Sallen/Key filters (highpass/lowpass). Two analog envelope turbines (filter/amp) and a single multi-wave LFO are additionally onboard.

Expanded Patch Bay

A lot of the unique MS-20’s enjoyable comes from the built-in patch bay, which lets you management the normalized sign path. This one additionally contains the Behringer Ok-2 MKII, which has been expanded.

First, they added a CV enter for pulse width modulation on oscillator 1. Secondly, the lacking 1v/oct (VCO 1+2) on the MKI can be now out there within the patch bay, in addition to a brand new  envelope 2 CV out, a set off enter, and a keyboard CV output socket. All the pieces else stays the identical, supplying you with 32 CV/sign patch factors.

Additional, it presents an exterior audio enter, traditional USB/MIDI implementation with voice precedence, and a 16-voice poly chain choice. On the again, you could find an audio output (mono), MIDI through, a USB port, an ON/OFF swap, and a DC enter. Just like the MK1, it may be mounted as an 80HP voice in a Eurorck case.

First Impression

There isn’t any sound demo but. Because the system is in inventory, it gained’t be lengthy earlier than the primary movies pop up. It appears to be like like a stable replace for its MS-20 clone. The truth that it now has a 1v/oct enter is a pleasant addition. 

The extra sound choices (FM, sync, and PWM) now set it other than the unique MS-20, which can be good as a result of Korg solely did this on the MS-20M in 2015.

Behringer Ok-2 MKII is accessible now for $199/199€.

Extra data right here: Behringer 

Accessible at my companion

Thomann

{Hardware} Synthesizer Information