The Bombay Excessive Courtroom hears Novex v. Nationwide Sports activities Membership of India
The Bombay Excessive Courtroom, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, heard an software filed by Novex Communications Non-public Restricted in opposition to the Nationwide Sports activities Membership of India (NSCI). An occasion performed over the previous three days at NSCI’s “Dome” premises, whereby sure sound recordings of Novex might have been performed, following which the petition was filed by Novex. It was contended by NSCI that the premises had been handed over underneath an Operation and Administration Settlement inserting compliance obligations underneath the Copyright Act, 1957 on Defendant No. 2. Nevertheless, the plaintiff submitted that the defendants couldn’t keep away from legal responsibility by shifting blame between themselves whereas flouting court docket orders.
Additional, it was submitted by the defendant {that a} license software had been submitted to the plaintiff and was awaiting a response, however the Courtroom noticed that it merely appeared like a request from the Transport Minister of Maharashtra looking for a complimentary, fee-free license citing the general public significance of a three-day programme. The Courtroom noticed that this request didn’t represent a industrial provide to resolve license charges for the approved use of the plaintiff’s mental property. The Courtroom directed a reply to the extra affidavit to be filed inside two weeks.
Case Title: Novex Communications Non-public Restricted v. Nationwide Sports activities Membership Of India & Anr.
Case No.: Interim Utility (L) No.1708 Of 2025
Learn order right here
AI-Generated Work Can Get Copyright However AI System Can’t Be Creator: Indian Copyright Workplace
The Indian Copyright Workplace has dominated that a man-made intelligence (AI) system can’t be acknowledged as an writer underneath the Copyright Act, 1957. Whereas authentic AI-generated works expressed in tangible kinds are eligible for copyright safety, in line with the Copyright Workplace, the non-human software program or AI system itself can’t be assigned authorship. Below Part 2(d)(vi) of the Act, the one that causes the computer-generated work to be created is legally thought of to be the writer.
The discovering arose from a case regarding AI researcher and CEO of Creativeness Engines, Mr. Stephen Thaler, who had hunted for copyright registration for the paintings A Latest Entrance to Paradise, generated by his AI system DABUS. Mr. Stephen Thaler’s has already utilized for the registration in throughout 16 world jurisdictions. He was beforehand rejected by a US court docket in March 2025 on the grounds that the US Copyright Act mandates human authorship.
You’ll be able to learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom Appoints Advocate Gautam Bhatia as Amicus Curiae in Janhvi Kapoor Persona Rights Swimsuit
The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has appointed advocate Gautam Bhatia as amicus curiae in a persona rights go well with filed by Bollywood actor Janhvi Kapoor. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani made the appointment to safe impartial authorized help because the court docket examines the broader authorized limits and complexities of persona rights throughout the digital area.
Janhvi Kapoor had approached the Delhi Excessive Courtroom looking for safety in opposition to the unauthorized on-line exploitation of her persona rights, together with impersonation, industrial misuse, and sexually specific content material. Whereas declining a blanket takedown of the 6,884 URLs submitted within the petition, the Courtroom directed the rapid removing of 552 URLs containing prima facie grossly vulgar or pornographic materials and instructed Jahnvi Kapoor to segregate the remaining hyperlinks into sexually specific content material, direct monetization, and oblique industrial misuse.
You’ll be able to learn extra about it right here.
Bombay Excessive Courtroom Grants Interim Safety to Shruti Haasan In opposition to AI-Generated Deepfakes and Morphed Pictures
The Bombay Excessive Courtroom has granted an interim injunction to actor Shruti Haasan in a lawsuit filed in opposition to a number of entities over the alleged unauthorized use of her identification, which included AI-generated deepfakes, manipulated movies, and unapproved industrial endorsements.
The Courtroom noticed that there was a powerful prima facie case in her favor, noting that any continued circulation of AI-generated content material might trigger irreparable harm to Shruti’s goodwill, popularity and industrial pursuits. The Courtroom acknowledged the rapid danger to her identification and observing that persona, publicity, and privateness rights possess constitutional safety underneath Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Structure of India.
You’ll be able to learn extra about it right here.
HarperCollins Acquires Rights to Publish Sonia Gandhi’s Memoir “Belonging”
HarperCollins India has acquired the publishing rights in India for Congress chief Sonia Gandhi’s forthcoming memoir, Belonging: A Journey of Love, which is slated for launch on November 10. This settlement follows the controversy {that a} earlier publishing cope with Penguin Random Home India had fell by as a consequence of disagreements over sure contents of the ebook that the writer allegedly needed eliminated. The memoir guarantees a deeply private account of Gandhi’s life, tracing her childhood in post-war Veneto, her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi, and her intensive political journey over the previous fifty years. Internationally, it’s reported that Alfred A Knopf, a division of Penguin Random Home, is the writer of the ebook.
You’ll be able to learn extra about it right here.
Sayani Gupta Recordsdata ₹9 Crore Defamation Swimsuit In opposition to Vinita Negi Over ‘Aasmani’ Plagiarism Allegations
Actor Sayani Gupta has filed a ₹9 crore defamation go well with earlier than the Mumbai Metropolis Civil Courtroom in opposition to filmmaker Vinita Negi, completely denying allegations of copyright infringement and breach of belief associated to the quick movie Aasmani. Gupta’s go well with alleges that Negi’s claims are false, deceptive, and have triggered her substantial skilled harm, which notably included the withdrawal of the movie from the Indian Movie Competition of New Zealand after Negi circulated a “Assertion of Help” on social media. Along with financial damages, Gupta is looking for the removing of the allegedly defamatory materials together with an unconditional public apology and retraction. Earlier, Negi had alleged that the quick movie was just like an unfinished documentary titled Prabha, and that each the initiatives had an aged lady and a classic automotive because the crux of the story.
You’ll be able to learn extra about it right here.
Broadcast Guidelines Get Sharper Enamel: MIB Provides Graded Penalties, Eases Some Obligations
Telecommunications (Tv, Radio and Related Providers) Guidelines, 2026, have been printed on September 2 and the file was 76 pages lengthy, in contrast with the sooner session draft launched on June 12. The Ministry of Info and Broadcasting (MIB) revised its proposed regulatory framework for tv and radio and launched an in depth compliance and penalty structure.
A significant addition was Schedule 4, that established a proper hierarchy for civil penalties by classifying violations as non-severe, minor, reasonable, or main relying on whether or not it’s a repeat operational offense. Nevertheless, the MIB additionally softened sure circumstances for renewal, clarifying that the edge for denying a renewal of a license, which was within the earlier draft set at greater than 5 breaches, would now solely apply if the breaches have been formally adjudicated by the competent authority.
You’ll be able to learn extra about it right here.