Authorities Releases Draft Telecommunications Guidelines for Tv and Radio Providers Underneath New Telecommunications Act, 2023
The Ministry of Data and Broadcasting on June 12, 2026 launched the draft Telecommunications (Tv, Radio and Related Providers) Guidelines, 2026 (“Draft Guidelines”) to consolidate the rules issued for tv and radio companies below the now changed Telegraph Act, 1885, throughout the framework of the newly enacted Telecommunications Act, 2023 (“Act”). The Act was handed by the Parliament within the 12 months 2023 to exchange the Telegraph Act of 1885.
The brand new Draft Guidelines mix six older, separate tips into one single, simplified rulebook. This contains older insurance policies for satellite tv for pc TV channels, Direct-to-Residence satellite tv for pc tv, Headend-in-the-Sky cable community techniques, non-public FM radio, group radio, and Web Protocol Tv.
The principle aim of the Draft Guidelines is to “simplify and harmonize the present regime whereas selling ease of doing enterprise within the tv and radio broadcasting sector”, as clarified below the Press Launch for the “Draft Telecommunication Guidelines Associated to Tv, Radio and Related Providers Printed for Public Session” of the Ministry of Data and Broadcasting of June 12, 2026.
The general public and trade consultants have been given till July 27, 2026, to ship of their ideas and strategies earlier than these Draft Guidelines grow to be official.
You may learn the press launch right here.
You may entry the principles right here.
Delhi Excessive Court docket Protects StoryTV’s Micro-Drama Content material from Rogue Web sites and Telegram Channels
The Delhi Excessive Court docket granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of Greenhorn Wellness Non-public Restricted, the operator of the subscription-based micro-drama platform “StoryTV”, and restrained sure web sites and Telegram channels from internet hosting, streaming, downloading, or in any other case distributing its copyrighted content material with out authorization. The Court docket discovered that StoryTV had established a prima facie case, that the steadiness of comfort was in its favour, and that it was prone to undergo irreparable hurt within the absence of interim safety.
Greenhorn alleged that the defendant web sites reproduced and streamed over 80 of its copyrighted micro-drama works, together with by compiling whole seasons into downloadable movies, whereas additionally utilizing StoryTV’s emblems to create a misunderstanding of affiliation.
The Court docket famous that the defendants actively facilitated entry to infringing content material, and noticed that one defendant operated a Progressive Internet App and Telegram channel that inspired comparable infringing actions and demonstrated information of infringement by discussions referring to DMCA takedown notices. Greenhorn asserted possession of copyright within the works as the primary proprietor below Sections 17(b) and 17(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, primarily based on work-for-hire preparations.
Case Title: Greenhorn Wellness Non-public Restricted V. John Doe & Ors.
Quotation: CS(COMM) 618/2026
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Court docket Observes Instagram Music Library Can’t Prima Facie Be Used for Industrial Functions
The Delhi Excessive Court docket referred a copyright dispute between Zee Leisure Enterprises Restricted and Zivore Attire Non-public Restricted, which operates the attire model Libas, to mediation after Zivore undertook to not use any music from Zee’s repertoire obtainable in Instagram’s Music Library till the injunction utility is lastly determined. The dispute arose from allegations that Libas used songs from Zee’s repertoire in Instagram reels selling its merchandise with out authorisation.
Whereas noting that many of the allegedly infringing reels had already been eliminated, the Court docket examined Instagram’s Music Tips and coverage paperwork and noticed that, prima facie, music obtainable by Instagram’s licensed music library is meant for private, non-commercial use and can’t be used for business model promotion with out applicable licences. The Court docket discovered prima facie benefit in Zee’s competition that Instagram’s licensing framework didn’t allow such business use, and referred the events to mediation to discover a business decision of the dispute.
Case Title: Zee Leisure Enterprises Restricted v. Zivore Attire Non-public Restricted
Case Quantity: CS (COMM) 651 / 2026 & IA. 15855/2026
You may learn extra about it right here.
Bengaluru Industrial Court docket Dismisses Copyright Infringement Swimsuit Towards App Developer for Lack of Proof
Bengaluru Industrial Court docket dismissed a copyright infringement go well with filed by Pathways Basis towards an Indian app developer Arpit Roy, holding that the plaintiff had didn’t show infringement of its copyrighted sources and movies. The Pathways Basis alleged that Roy copied content material from its web site and “Child Milestones App”, eliminated its logos and watermarks from movies, and used the fabric in his functions, “Child Improvement: Milestones” and “Child Steps: Child Improvement”, for business achieve.
It sought a everlasting injunction and ₹2 crore in punitive damages. Roy contended that his functions merely embedded YouTube URLs moderately than internet hosting movies immediately, and identified that his YouTube channel had been terminated following a copyright strike and that each functions had already been faraway from Apple’s App Retailer.
The Court docket famous that the functions had been taken down and located that the plaintiff had not produced passable proof demonstrating continued infringement thereafter. Consequently, it held that the plaintiff had “totally failed” to determine copyright infringement and dismissed the go well with with prices.
Case Title: Pathways Basis v. Arpit Roy
Case Quantity: Com.OS.No.40/2025
You may learn extra about it right here.
Delhi Excessive Court docket Grants Safety to Acharya Manish’s Character Rights Towards AI-Generated Faux Endorsements
The Delhi Excessive Court docket granted an ad-interim injunction defending the character and publicity rights of Manish Grover after discovering a prima facie case that unidentified individuals had used synthetic intelligence to create faux endorsements of well being merchandise by manipulating his voice and movies. The Court docket noticed that the defendants had gone past unauthorised use of his character attributes by using AI-based voice cloning expertise to falsely depict him as endorsing services and products with which he had no affiliation. The go well with alleged that real video footage of Grover was altered and circulated on Fb and Instagram to advertise third-party merchandise, together with natural treatments and health-related merchandise, with out his consent.
Recognising Grover’s established public repute within the fields of Ayurveda and built-in healthcare, the Court docket held that his title, picture, likeness and voice constituted precious aspects of his character and publicity rights. Observing that the defendants seemed to be intentionally capitalising on the goodwill, credibility and public belief related to him, the Court docket restrained them from utilizing or exploiting his persona or passing off merchandise as being endorsed by him. The Court docket additionally directed Meta Platforms to disable or block entry to the recognized infringing content material and permitted the plaintiffs to hunt removing of any additional infringing content material found throughout the pendency of the proceedings.
Case Title: Manish Grover & Anr. v. John Doe & Anr.
Case Quantity: CS(COMM) 659/2026
You may learn extra about it right here.
Movie Business Seeks Restricted Revival of CBFC’s Tatkaal Certification Facility
Following the Ministry of Data and Broadcasting’s resolution to abolish the CBFC’s Tatkaal certification facility, a number of movie trade our bodies have urged the Authorities to reintroduce the mechanism in a restricted kind for distinctive circumstances. Whereas stakeholders acknowledge issues concerning misuse of the fast-track course of, they contend that an emergency certification route stays essential the place delays come up as a consequence of components past a producer’s management, corresponding to court docket proceedings, post-production delays, certification disputes, or instructions from Revising Committees.
The Tatkaal scheme beforehand allowed producers to acquire expedited certification upon fee of 3 times the usual examination payment. Business representatives have proposed a restricted emergency quota system requiring documentary justification and approval from senior CBFC officers, as a substitute of a whole restoration of the sooner framework. The demand follows current situations the place movies reportedly acquired certification shortly earlier than launch as a consequence of certification-related delays, elevating issues in regards to the absence of an expedited mechanism below the present regime.
You may learn extra about it right here.