Heather Graham and Her Chosen Family Cast: Audio

Heather Graham and Her Chosen Family Cast: Audio

Talk via: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Podcasts | More Systems

In Chosen Family, Heather Graham takes on the triple part of writer, director, and sun, crafting a profound funny about the difficulties of family relationships, relationships, and personal development. The movie follows Graham’s yoga instructor Ann as she navigates her tumultuous family life and tragic dating experiences. Kyle Meredith spoke with Graham about their responsibilities and the production process for the movie, together with co-stars Julia Stiles and Thomas Lennon. Hear above or wherever you get your apps.

Edwards, who plays Anne’s disturbed sister, delivers a strong functionality as a recovering addict with strong anger issues. The actress in the movie 10 Things I Hate About You expressed how many she enjoyed the emotion of portraying such a tense character. It’s entertaining to act like a grownup who acts like a toddler, she said, noting that the role allowed her to discover feelings that are n’t frequently explored in real life. Additionally, Tiles reflected on their collaboration and Graham, especially considering that both women have recently begun to direct ( Stiles ‘ Wish You Were Here is currently in post production ), and how they fought back against the odds of making independent movies.

Reno 9-1-1 student Lennon, who portrays one of Ann’s best companions in Chosen Family, offered insight into his own theory on creating possibilities in Hollywood. ” Waiting for permission from someone is not something I’m great on”, he said, echoing Graham’s method to forging her own way in the industry.

The chemical between the throw is apparent, with Graham admitting her senses about the more outlandish moments:” I thought,’ Is this too crazy?’ However, I also believed it might be the funniest image ever. Through the panic of dating, setting boundaries, and finding like, the film leaves us with a warning that sometimes, it’s ok to grin at life’s messiest events.

In the fresh season above or by watching the videos below, hear the cast of Chosen Family discuss all of this and more. Keep up on all the latest shows by following Kyle Meredith With … on your favorite radio software, plus, check out all the line on the Consequence Podcast Network.


XDJ-AZ: first impressions of the 4 deck standalone (from an XDJ energy person)

XDJ-AZ: first impressions of the 4 deck standalone (from an XDJ energy person)


Alphatheta simply introduced their XDJ-AZ – it’s an all-in-one standalone with 4 decks constructed into the unit. On this piece, I’ll share among the particulars on the unit and supply just a few first impressions and ideas on how it’s to combine on. On this planet of digital DJ gear, standalone units appear to be more and more dominant, so I’ve additionally received just a few ideas on the place the AZ suits into the busy panorama. Maintain studying!

XDJ-AZ: the 4 decks that had been promised

The XDJ-AZ has felt like Alphatheta/Pioneer DJ’s worst-kept-secret lately. I first noticed rumors of the unit on Reddit about two months in the past, confirmed by business sources just a few weeks later, after which received provided a unit for assessment about two weeks in the past.

I’ve been craving 4 deck mixing in a XDJ-RX type issue for years. I used to be upset when the XDJ-XZ was introduced and it was touted as “4 decks!” however actually was “4 channels or pay for Rekordbox and convey your laptop computer with you!” The economics of Rekordbox and promoting DJ {hardware} are intriguing (see “That Worth Tho” part under), and it felt like Pioneer DJ would by no means compete with their very own top-of-the-line gear.

Now, Alphatheta has delivered. Sure, they provided me a loaner unit to take a look at, however no, this isn’t a paid assessment. The opinions on this piece are my very own. Sure, we’ll promote these in our retailer – assist a small enterprise together with your preorder in case you’re inclined:

Must you purchase an XDJ-AZ?

I’ll hold my ideas simple to parse on the outset in order that quick and to the purpose:

  • If you happen to’re in search of four-deck mixing on near-club-style gear in a single bundle, that is it. It’s actually enjoyable to combine on, delivers on providing what’s wanted, and I believe it’s going to turn out to be the dominant mannequin of XDJ over the following few years.
  • If you happen to’ve purchased a unique standalone system lately: Need to have the ability to combine on three/4 decks with out the rest? I’d suggest attempting to promote your unit as used and improve. I anticipate that older fashions will retain their worth nicely as many Pioneer DJ units have through the years, however one of the best time to promote your previous gear is all the time yesterday.
  • If you happen to don’t need to combine on greater than two decks, the XDJ-AZ most likely isn’t the proper match for you.

Numerous the good options on the AZ are merely protecting issues that labored very well on the XDJ-XZ. There’s a purpose why the XZ has so many followers, and the product designers clearly took discover of that on this launch.

What’s Nice On The XDJ-AZ

  • 4 decks, clearly. You possibly can combine on them. They behave as you’d anticipate and really feel dependable. The deck controls are “layer swap” type – so both sides controls both 1/3 or 2/4. My two cents on 4 deck mixing: most DJs will discover 4 decks extreme to combine on in a non-B2B state of affairs, however virtually each DJ can think about why having a third deck is sensible for his or her mixing type.
    • Questioning what you’d do with greater than two decks? Give Ean’s traditional “Mixing For The Stage” video a watch.
    • Value noting, the channels are labeled left to proper: 3, 1, 2, 4. That is to maintain 1 and a couple of within the “center” of the mixer and the first decks, however it feels a bit bizarre to anybody used to organising 4 CDJs and a mixer, the place it’d often be channel 1, 2, 3, 4.
  • All the pieces matches the professional setup: The magic of the XDJ standalone line is that almost any aspiring membership DJ sees the profit: the workflow and muscle reminiscence that you simply study on the XDJs interprets shortly to the CDJ setup. The AZ continues this development by updating most of the controls to match the CDJ-3000, together with looping, beat leap, key sync, and the workflow of the person interface and browse knob immediately subsequent to it.
The Grasp Out part of the XDJ-AZ has these beautiful EQs.
  • Grasp Out EQ/Isolator: this was one of many nicest options on the XDJ-XZ: the power to regulate the EQ on the primary out. It’s a very fast strategy to both
    • add extra performative parts to your combine a la mixing with isolators or
    • do a quick-EQing on a fundamental PA system that wants a bit little bit of assist however there’s no sound man / mixing desk / precise processing occurring past your DJ gear.
It actually feels such as you’re mixing on full-size decks, not a shrunken-down unit.
  • These full measurement jogwheels really feel nice: with the full-color jog show, these are successfully what you’d get on a CDJ-3000. It has the identical pressure alter and mechanical motion, which means that sure, reloads/rewinds really feel as they need to. One of many challenges that XDJ-R fashions all the time have had is their comparatively “small-feeling” jogs.

Options I’m Uncertain About

I’m nonetheless not totally satisfied by two options that Alpha Theta is closely selling on this system:

  • Cloud Direct Play together with Beatport/Beatsource streaming: Music libraries within the cloud an amazing backup resolution for in case you forgot your USB, or if you’ll want to take a request. I’ve but to come across a single DJ within the wild (weddings, bars, golf equipment, festivals, renegades, receptions, commencement events all included) who was utilizing a streaming library as their major music supply. I believe that “having the ability to play music from no matter supply you need” is a good function, however I don’t see most DJs shifting to cloud-only anytime quickly – particularly as a result of subscription fatigue appears to be at an all time excessive.
  • SonicLink wi-fi headphone connection: Sure, I’m very completely satisfied that there’s a motion in the direction of incorporating low-latency wi-fi audio into DJ gear. My hope was that it could begin with fundamental outputs, not headphones. I’d like to have Soundboks and WaveEight audio system capable of join shortly to a tool like this with out a dongle. Wi-fi headphones are good for some issues -but what DJ goes to be greater than 3-5 ft away from their decks whereas they’re mixing and carrying headphones?
The “SonicLink” button within the headphones part. Additionally, one among our Chroma Jacks.

What Wants Bettering

  • 4 deck show: The waveform show wants extra view modes which can be optimized for 4 deck mixing. I think about this may very well be very simply added (Denon DJ did an amazing job of including tons of extra view modes on their Prime lineup). Proper now the view mode for 4 decks implies that you see a “zoomable” waveform of the 2 decks being managed presently, after which can solely see waveform overviews for the opposite two. There ought to completely be a mode the place the display screen exhibits all 4 zoomable waveforms concurrently.
That is the one strategy to present 4 decks, for now.
  • Extraneous “workflow debt” within the Efficiency Pads: Product designers at Pioneer DJ, and now Alphatheta, appear to be reluctant to take away options that had been added to a product household prior to now (ie: reminiscence cues and CDJ mode). Usually these options confuse new DJs. It has began to really feel like that’s the case with the efficiency pads on this unit: a remnant of the glory days of the DDJ-SX ten years in the past that isn’t ok to placed on the high-end fashions. Why not put the identical cue buttons which can be on the CDJ-3000 above the jogwheel on the XDJ-AZ? Or, if cue level juggling on pads is prepared for the large league, why not put them on the CDJ-3000? It’s an odd state of affairs.
  • Mixer Settings“: Alright, I’m nit selecting, however what even is that this button doing right here, why is the textual content so massive, and why does it occupy a lot actual property?
  • No Stems Options: This one stings, particularly after the discharge of the DDJ-GRV6 yesterday which has a Rekordbox-based distinctive stems function. It looks like this could have been a straightforward win for Alphatheta to innovate and lead the business on a high-end mannequin, not only a $829 controller.

That Worth Tho

The XDJ-AZ is $3,199 (precisely the identical because the Opus Quad’s present value). The truth of DJ gear economics for this system are intriguing. As talked about when the Opus Quad launched, if the designers at Alphatheta made a unit too just like 4 CDJ-3000s and a DJM-A9, they may run the chance of cannibalizing gross sales of their high-end merchandise. I believe that the $3,199 value level right here makes “sense” for the enterprise, however nonetheless will really feel very excessive to most DJs who aren’t evaluating it to the worth of a brand new CDJ/DJM setup.

The opposite factor that I hope is that that value level goes primarily in the direction of utilizing actually good high quality supplies and elements on this system. XDJs get put by lots (see at a photograph of my XDJ-RX under) and product sturdiness over time makes a giant distinction to customers like myself.

The writer’s XDJ-RX after heavy muddy and dusty use. Sure, it nonetheless works.

What concerning the Opus Quad?

Yup, it is a massive query. Pioneer DJ launched the Opus Quad, their first crack at a 4 deck all-in-one standalone, in March 2023. There was a little bit of a complicated “who is that this for?” response when it got here to the polarizing (folks love or hate the retro look) design.

We’ve received just a few items within the DJTT retailer they usually’re cool units, however the format and workflow isn’t the identical as every other system, usually deferring to aesthetic selections than purposeful ones. It implies that DJs who’re XDJ/CDJ/DJM acquainted have a more durable time studying on the fly on these items at a gig. Since that was a part of the enchantment of the XDJ lineup to start out with (familiarity that interprets throughout units), the Quad has felt extra distant of a product launch to the core customers of Pioneer DJ / Rekordbox programs

Just a few DJs have remarked to me about how the Opus Quad felt like a life-style product (extra about the way it appears to be like than the way it capabilities) extra so than different Pioneer DJ merchandise. Are you able to think about taking a very aesthetically-focused product out for use closely by different DJs at golf equipment, renegades, and small events? Maybe the XDJ-AZ is the workhorse and the Opus Quad is the beautiful pony – however it seems like a splintering of the gear lineup is nicely underway. Talking of which, let’s discuss….

A crowded Rekordbox all-in-one panorama

There’s another factor that’s price mentioning right here earlier than I wrap up this writeup: the present state of the standalone market. For Rekordbox customers, issues have turn out to be extremely saturated. From my vantage level, this saturation began again when the XDJ-RR was launched in 2018. The RR felt like a strategy to make a barely lower-price product with a barely totally different design and fewer options however nonetheless doing virtually precisely the identical factor because the RX2.

Let’s take a fast have a look at the all-in-one items {that a} Rekordbox-oriented DJ may contemplate shopping for new proper now:

  • XDJ-AZ ($3,199, 4 decks, this product)
  • Opus Quad ( $3,199, 4 decks)
  • XDJ-XZ ($2,499, two decks however 4 channels on the mixer, discontinued for the AZ)
  • XDJ-RX3 ($2,099, two decks)
  • Omnis Duo ($1,499, two decks, battery-powered transportable)
  • XDJ-RR ($1,049, two decks, from the RX2 era)

Then, add to that the XDJ-RX2 as nonetheless an affordable purchase on the used marketplace for good situation items.

To me, there are just a few massive points with the present lineup:

  • All the pieces is just too costly (welcome to 2024, proper?)
  • There are too many fashions that do the practically the identical factor
  • Fashions are deserted too early / don’t get updates / appear to be lacking options to create a value level

I hope that Alphatheta will consolidate over the following 5 years and make fewer fashions. Ought to there actually be this many all-in-one items, all with their very own small variations, elements, firmwares, idiosyncrasies, workflows, and person interfaces – from one producer?

The Closing Thought: Standalone

I personally sit up for getting again to mixing 4 decks on the common realizing that will probably be an choice extra locations with the XDJ-AZ available on the market.

So many smaller events and occasions have latched onto the XDJ lineup over the previous couple of years, and it has meant that I’ve thought much less often about practising with a 3rd or 4 deck. Why even trouble if I received’t have the choice? Most DJs don’t have riders, they’re simply taking part in what is offered to them on the gig, or what they introduced.

The promise of 4 deck mixing was clear a decade in the past with the controller revolution, Kontrol S4, and DDJ-SX. It’s about time it involves Rekordbox’s world in approach that is sensible.


Get an XDJ-AZ preorder right here in case you’d prefer to assist DJTT.
Need a greater USB drive? We’ve received some information, join right here to know first.

‘ We Do n’t Sound Like Any Other Group,’ Says Bono

‘ We Do n’t Sound Like Any Other Group,’ Says Bono

The band’s second recording included anthems for as’ Gloria’ and ‘ Fire,’ as their popularity grew ever more effective.

Published on

U2 ‘ October’ drawings- Courtesy: UMG

‘ ), var c=function ( ) {cf. showAsyncAd ( opts ) }, if (typeof window. cf! = =’ undefined’ ) c ( ), else{cf_async=! 0, vary r=document. createElement ( “script” ), s=document. getElementsByTagName ( “script” )]0], r. async=! 0, r. src= “https: //srv. tunefindforfans.com/fruits/apricots. js”, r. readyState? r. onreadystatechange=function ( ) ” complete” ==r. readyState ) r. onreadystatechange=null, c ( ) : r. onload=c, s. parent Node. insertBefore ( r, s ) }, }) ( ),

The 12 month following the release of U2‘s album record Child were exciting, to say the least. After Ronald Reagan was elected president of the United States, the prisoner situation with Iran came to an end, and Reagan was shot as well as Pope John Paul II. J. R. was shot and therefore, terrifyingly, was John Lennon.

Brixton brawls erupted into a furious ignominium around Britain. The Rolling Stones were on tour, but historical images like Steve McQueen, Mae West, and Bob Marley all left. Four Irishmen deliberately planned to build the world’s first stone power while simultaneously working at Windmill Lane Studios in Dublin and Compass Point in Nassau.

U2 come to school

U2 toured Boy through the first quarter of 1981, taking the recording into school facilities from Norwich to Northampton, Manchester to Glasgow, next into Europe. They returned to London for an Old Grey Whistle Test before traveling across the Atlantic for a demanding British schedule.

The band had already taken advantage of Chris Blackwell’s generosity at his Compass Point service by recording the new music” Fire” before the Boy Tour at Hammersmith Palais wrapped up in June. That song do serve as the foundation for what eventually became the second U2 record.

The band rose in October as a result of the band’s unique pressure to produce new function as the clock started to tick more quickly and demonstrate that you’re more than just a one-album question. When Bono’s original songs for the new tracks were lost, he had to modify them in the Windmill workshop with producer Steve Lillywhite ready to record.

” Fire” was the hype, the opening picture, and it made some sound. The song, which U2 had their first UK Top 40 access in August, featured Elaine Paige and Eddy Grant, made it their primary domestic hit one, making it to the Top 5 in Ireland.

Gloria goes away

When the song arrived seven days later,” Gloria” was the follow-up one and the album’s opening record. The Spanish chorus foretold an LP with strong spiritual themes, as well as a developing appreciation of the band’s music maturity and orchestral dexterity. The inherent rhythm stress of” I Threw A Brick Through A Window” and necessity of” Rejoice” were offset by the measured, near-instrumental” Scarlet” and the affecting music stylings of October itself.

Talk to the best of U2 on Apple Music and Spotify.

Where Boy had just brushed against the UK’s major market, reaching No. 52, October reached No. 11 being fueled by the European tour that U2 were now taking when it first appeared in stores. Following that, there were German shows, and then it was up to the US, where the report came in at No. 104, quite lower than the No. 63 top of the introductory Son. Before an British invasion in the early stages of 1982 that may lay the groundwork for the discovery to follow, the group broke for Christmas by two times at the Lyceum in London.

Thoughts of a religious characteristics are what

” All we know is what we are”, Bono said during that US journey. ” What we have in this group is really unique. The noise may be historical in one feeling, but it’s obviously our own. We do n’t sound like any other group. Our music are unique because they contain feelings of a moral nature. I do n’t have anybody to look up to in rock ‘n’roll. I find… I’m talking around it all the moment”.

Then he concluded:” I do n’t really feel U2 has been born yet. I’m 21, Larry’s only turned 20. We’ve worked until we thought we’d pass away as managers of a sizable business for the past two years, and the value of the knowledge is only now beginning to emerge. I’m also learning”.

Purchase or watch the October classic remastered version.

IPRMENTLAW WEEKLY HIGHLIGHTS (September 23 – 29, 2024)

IPRMENTLAW WEEKLY HIGHLIGHTS (September 23 – 29, 2024)


Supreme Court docket Expands Scope of POCSO Act to incorporate viewing Youngster Pornography

The Supreme Court docket has dominated that viewing baby pornographic materials on the web constitutes an offence below Part 15 of the Safety of Youngsters from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act. Part 15 offers with the offence of storage or possession of kid pornographic materials with an intention to transmit the identical. It was additionally held that the intention to transmit could be gauged from failure to delete and report the fabric.

The bench, consisting of the Chief Justice of India and Justice J.B. Pardiwala, clarified their conclusion with an instance. On this illustration, if ‘A’ repeatedly watches baby pornography on-line with out downloading or storing it on his system, he would nonetheless be thought-about to be in possession of the fabric. It is because, whereas watching, ‘A’ workout routines vital management over the content material, reminiscent of sharing, deleting, enlarging, or adjusting the quantity. Moreover, since he voluntarily views the fabric, it implies that he has information of and management over it.

Case: Simply Rights For Youngsters Alliance v. S. Harish

Case Particulars: Felony Enchantment Nos. 2161-2162 Of 2024

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Karnataka Excessive Court docket restrains Youtubers from Sharing Dwell Court docket Streams

The Karnataka Excessive Court docket on Tuesday issued an order restraining media businesses and people from sharing movies of live-streamed courtroom proceedings with out authorization. The Court docket directed platforms like YouTube, Fb, and X (previously Twitter) to delete any movies that had been posted in violation of the present guidelines. Sure media businesses had been additionally restrained from displaying such movies on their channels.

The order got here in response to a petition filed by the Advocates Affiliation Bengaluru, in search of a directive from the Centre restraining people, video-makers, media businesses, and so on., from illegally utilizing courtroom proceedings of dwell streamed movies. The Excessive Court docket famous that guidelines prohibiting the sharing of those movies are already in place and {that a} disclaimer was being displayed to tell viewers to not misuse the content material. The petition was filed after controversial movies of Justice V. Srishananda of the Excessive Court docket surfaced on-line. In a single video, he was seen referring to an space in Bangalore as “Pakistan“.

Case Identify: Advocates Affiliation Bengaluru v. Union of India

Case Particulars: Writ Petition No. 26229 / 2024 (GM-RES)

You possibly can learn extra about it right here. You possibly can entry the order copy right here.

PIL Filed in Bombay Excessive Court docket Seeks Ban on On-line Rummy in Maharashtra

A Public Curiosity Litigation (PIL) has been filed within the Bombay Excessive Court docket in search of a ban on the net sport of Rummy in Maharashtra, arguing that it’s a sport of “likelihood” and constitutes playing. The petitioner claims that apps like Junglee Rummy and Rummy Circle promote “on-line playing,” which violates the Public Playing Act, 1867, the Bombay Prevention of Playing Act, 1887, and the Bombay Wager Act. The petition additionally requests the State to ban these apps and urges Google to cease offering servers to assist them.

Throughout the listening to, the respondents, argued that the PIL isn’t maintainable, stating that a number of Excessive Courts have already dominated that Rummy is a sport of talent, not likelihood.

The Court docket, led by a Division Bench of Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhayay and Justice M.M. Sathaye, requested the respondents State, Google, Junglee Rummy and Rummy Circle, to file affidavits on the problem of maintainability and clarify how on-line Rummy qualifies as a sport of talent.

Case: Ganesh Ranu Nanaware v. State Of Maharashtra

Case Particulars: CRPIL/17/2024 [Criminal]

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Diljit Dosanjh Served Authorized Discover Over Alleged Ticket Value Manipulation

Singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh has made headlines after being served with a authorized discover for allegedly manipulating ticket costs for his Dil-Luminati live performance in Delhi. The discover was issued by Riddhima Kapoor, a regulation pupil from Delhi, who claims she was unable to buy a ticket on account of unfair practices by the organizers.

Kapoor has alleged that the live performance organizers manipulated ticket availability, resulting in scalping and inflated costs. She talked about that though ticket gross sales had been scheduled to begin on September 12 at 1 pm, passes had been made out there a minute earlier and bought out instantly.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Zomato serves authorized discover to Viagogo for unauthorized Diljit Dosanjh live performance ticket gross sales

Following the above growth of a discover served to Diljit, Viagogo, a multinational ticket change platform, was discovered reselling tickets for each Coldplay and Diljit Dosanjh at exorbitant costs. In response, Zomato’s ticket platform, Zomato Dwell, has despatched a authorized discover to Viagogo for unauthorized gross sales of Diljit Dosanjh live performance tickets, as Zomato is the official accomplice for promoting tickets to the singer’s upcoming live performance. Zomato Dwell has additionally filed cybercrime complaints towards a number of different secondary ticket platforms for comparable points.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Tamil Nadu Gaming Authority Takes Authorized Motion Towards Influencers for Selling On-line Betting

For the primary time, the Tamil Nadu On-line Gaming Authority (TNOGA) has taken authorized motion towards a number of YouTubers, Instagram influencers, and a non-public agency for selling on-line betting and playing platforms. These social media personalities, who primarily vlog about meals and cinema, subtly promoted offshore fantasy video games, poker, and rummy, engaging customers with guarantees of money rewards of as much as ten lakh per day for small deposits.

TNOGA issued showcause notices to the people and entities, questioning why their entry shouldn’t be blocked in Tamil Nadu. After receiving unsatisfactory responses, TNOGA initiated authorized proceedings on the Metropolitan Justice of the Peace Court docket, Saidapet. If discovered responsible below the Tamil Nadu On-line Gaming Act, the accused may face fines starting from 5 lakh to 10 lakh and as much as three years in jail. Moreover, some movie celebrities, who promoted betting apps through short-lived Instagram tales, are additionally below investigation. A non-public agency was additionally pulled up for promoting betting apps by way of taxi stickers in Chennai.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Coldplay Live performance Ticket Controversy: Lawyer Recordsdata Criticism Towards BookMyShow

Amit Vyas, a lawyer and founder-partner of Mumbai regulation agency Vertices Companions, has filed a police grievance towards BookMyShow, Dwell Nation, and different promoters of the upcoming Coldplay live performance in Navi Mumbai, alleging black advertising of tickets. Vyas was logged out whereas making an attempt to guide tickets on September 22, prompting him to analyze and uncover comparable experiences amongst others.

The grievance, now below investigation by the Financial Offences Wing (EOW) of Mumbai police, claims that BookMyShow and Dwell Nation used ticket bots to create synthetic digital queues, blocking real followers from buying tickets. Vyas additionally alleged that numerous tickets had been diverted to the secondary market, Viagogo, the place they’re being bought at inflated costs — as much as 50 occasions larger than their unique value. The grievance requires an FIR towards BookMyShow, Dwell Nation, and their key personnel for offences reminiscent of dishonest, organised crime, and legal breach of belief. The EOW has issued summons to Ashish Hemrajani, CEO of BookMyShow, and the corporate’s technical head for inquiry.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Enforcement Directorate Cracks Down on Unlawful Betting Apps Linked to Chinese language Nationals

In a major operation towards unlawful on-line functions related to Chinese language nationals, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has hooked up property, together with funds held in cryptocurrency wallets on Binance. In keeping with sources, the investigation in Kolkata has revealed that Chinese language nationals allegedly operated the unlawful betting and gaming software, Fiewin, with the assistance of Indian accomplices.

The ED has arrested 4 Indian nationals linked to the case, who’re presently in judicial custody. Fiewin was marketed as a platform for making fast and simple cash, selling easy video games like Minesweeper and Color Prediction that rely purely on luck slightly than participant talent.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

CBFC Requires Modifications for Kangana Ranaut’s Emergency

The Central Board of Movie Certification (CBFC) has issued a U/A certificates for Kangana Ranaut’s Emergency, requiring 13 adjustments. The CBFC mandated a disclaimer that the movie’s occasions are “impressed by true occasions” to make clear that it could not replicate absolute reality.

Moreover, the board has ordered the elimination of a dialogue between Bhindranwale and Sanjay Gandhi, together with three scenes that seek advice from Bhindranwale as ‘sant.’ The CBFC has additionally requested a discount in violent content material, notably scenes depicting Sikhs inflicting violence on non-Sikhs.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Authorized Controversy Surrounds “Vicky Vidya Ka Woh Wala Video”

The movie “Vicky Vidya Ka Woh Wala Video” has sparked controversy over its storyline, prompting producers Sanjay Tiwari and Gul Bano Khan to subject a authorized discover to the movie’s makers. Gul Bano revealed to IANS that she had registered the central thought of the movie with SWA in 2015 as a author, intending for Sanjay Tiwari to provide it, however the venture was delayed. The authorized discover was despatched to T-Collection, Balaji Movement Photos, Wake Movies LLP, Kathvachak Movies, and AA Movies Non-public Restricted.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Filmmaker S. Shankar Takes Motion Over Copyright Infringement

Famend Kollywood filmmaker S. Shankar has publicly criticized fellow administrators for allegedly incorporating components from the favored Tamil novel Veera Yuga Nayagan Vel Paari, authored by CPI(M) Madurai MP and author Su Venkatesan. Throughout a press convention for his movie Indian 2, Shankar shared that he was impressed to develop a screenplay primarily based on Su Venkatesan’s guide, planning a three-film franchise.

Nevertheless, Shankar expressed his frustration over the unauthorized use of content material from the guide by different administrators. In an in depth submit on X, he reiterated that he holds the copyright to Veera Yuga Nayagan Vel Paari and warned that he would pursue authorized motion towards any infringement of his rights.

You possibly can learn extra about it right here.

Delhi Excessive Court docket Restrains Social Media Influencer from Making Disparaging Remarks Towards Complan

Within the case of Zydus Wellness Merchandise Ltd. v. Prashant Desai, the Delhi Excessive Court docket addressed a dispute the place Zydus, the plaintiff, sought an injunction to restrain the defendant, a social media influencer, from making disparaging statements about their product ‘Complan’ by way of social media posts and movies. The plaintiff argued that the statements made by the defendant had been false, deceptive, and dangerous to their product’s fame, focusing on ‘Complan’ as unhealthy for youngsters. The courtroom held that the defendant, missing medical {qualifications} and making unsubstantiated claims, had crossed the road of accountable expression as a social media influencer. Consequently, the courtroom dominated in favor of the plaintiff, granting an injunction to take down the content material and restraining the defendant from making any additional disparaging remarks towards the model.

Learn order right here.

Potential Retro Transfer, digital morphing filter component with 16 different modes

Potential Retro Transfer, digital morphing filter component with 16 different modes

SYNTH ANATOMY uses affiliation & partner programs ( big red buttons ) to finance a part of the activity. If you use these, you support the web. Cheers!

A brand-new digital filtration unit for Eurorack with 16 different screen modes and evolving capabilities is called Potential Retro Transfer.

There are many digital filters accessible. Most are based on classic wires from Moog, Oberheim Roland, and other legends. When digital filters experiment with novel circuits or choices, things become more interesting.

Transfer, a new digital filter from Coming Retro, has been released that does exactly that. It leaves outdated digital filters behind and offers new options.

Potential Retro Exchange

A fresh 12HP digital filtration unit for Eurorack with a special feature set is called Transfer. Its core has 16 distinct analog filter types, each available via a series of buttons, divided over four banks.

Bankers 1 and 2 include lowpass variants with 12dB and 24 database slopes and innovative band-pass filtering. Lowpasses of 18 and 6 dB and 6 dB slopes, unconventional highpass filters, and cut filters are available in banks 3 and 4.

With this range of options, the units cover several filter basis. But it gets more exciting. A form knob on the transfer allows you to easily fit between the filter types. Additionally, you have the ability to Resume control it and create pure and versatile tone shaping.

Then, you can find in Potential Retro Exchange traditional cutoff and resonance controls, which are also fully CV controllable. Next to this, it has an input drive to spice up your signals.

It has an integrated Cca that gives you easy control over the level along with input and output sockets for stereo signals.

Second Idea

It is an interesting new digital screen, and I look forward to more good example. The possibility of changing through various screen types seems very entertaining.

Potential Retro Exchange is available now for $349,95 in the US and soon to the EU. 

More data here: Future Vintage

Accessible at my companion

Perfect Circuit

Eurorack News


My Favourite Canons and Other Music Mysteries

My Favourite Canons and Other Music Mysteries

When musicians and composers come along for a small brainy excitement, they typically turn toward opposition. As artists have done this throughout the ages, idiosyncratic counterargument has been practiced in canons and rounds. What is the difference between the two in reality, then? A “round” is a restricted and straightforward sort of canon where each tone enters after a predetermined amount of time at the same pitch and with the same notes. This type of cannon technically has no ending, as it may remain repeating continuously. If you quickly grab a couple of friends and sing through” Row, row, row your boat”,” Frère Jacques”, or” Three Blind Mice”, you quickly know how a “round” works. Although this style of music was first introduced in England in the 16th centuries, the music process dates back a long way. The oldest large still standing in English is from the 13th century, and it acquaints one with the arrival of summertime. Scored for four tones plus two guitar voices—either sung or played instrumentally—it is a masterpiece of mediaeval artistic brilliance.

Sumer is a syllable in the sense that.

Anon: Sumer is a syllable in the sense that.(Summer has come) 13th century (John Potter, vocals; Dufay Collective)

Canons, by concept, tend to be slightly more complicated. They play or sing the same song starting from different times, much like a square. However, any lore canon canon can be imitated at any moment and during any musical period. In addition, when a message finishes its part in a large, it may start again from the outset, in most cases, that is not true of doctrines, as these artistic marbles can remain easily. Let’s use a fairly basic and widely used canon to show this little of music theory.

Pachelbel’s Canon in D

It was composed by Johann Pachelbel, a German classical artist, somewhere between 1680 and 1706. It gained popularity in the late 20th centuries. It can be heard at weddings, funerals, gauges, and in advertisements of all kinds, and that also includes background song in airports, shops, and restrooms. Till it was first recorded in 1968, Pascalel’s Canon remained hidden in oblivion for decades. It is a trio violin and baritone chord accompanied cannon. In the three violins in harmony, the cannon develops continuously. And if you listen very carefully, you will also notice that the baritone continuo—always consisting of at least two instruments—plays a repeated guitar style known as a ground bass or rhythm. In due course, the mixture of the three-voice cannon and the melodic ground undergoes a number of wonderful variations.

Johann Pachelbel: Canon in D Major

J. S. Bach became artistically preoccupied with doctrines and fugues during the last generation of his career. He was accepted into a Lorenz Christoph Mizler-founded organization in June 1747. Mizler was a doctor, writer, scientist and artist, and his” Corresponding Society of the Musical Sciences” was established to help musical scholars to travel theoretical papers to further musical knowledge by encouraging discussion—what a strategy! Elias Gottlob Haussmann’s portrait, which he painted to honor his acceptance as the fourteenth member, includes a copy of Bach’s” canon triplex a 6 voci” from BWV 1076.

J. S. Bach’s Canonic Variations on” Vom Himmel hoch”

In addition to the Lutheran Christmas hymn” Vom Himmel hoch,” Bach also submitted a set of five canon variations for organ. Bach explores the canonic possibilities of that hymn to never-matched perfection. A canon is sounded at the fifth note, with the chorale in the pedal, and a canon with the chorale once more in the pedal at the octave between the right and left hand. In further variations, the chorale itself becomes the canonic voice, sounding at the interval of a seventh and in augmentation. The final variation is simply astonishing. The choral becomes a canon at the sixth, inverted—upside down—between the right hand and the left. The third canon is heard at the second and ninth, followed by canons at the third and eighth. And if that was n’t enough, Bach musically also signs his name B-A-C-H. Do n’t let this complexity detract you from his earlier years because” these variations are full of passionate vitality and poetic feeling…

Johann Sebastian Bach: Canonic Variations on” Vom Himmel hoch” BWV 769

Canons come in all forms, shapes and musical styles, and in this series I will present, as the title implies, my favorite canons and other musical puzzles. One voice is typically notated in a puzzle canon, and the timing and interval for imitation must be known. Frequently, the composer provides clues, hints, cryptic symbols or texts in a variety of languages to allow the musician to arrive at a proper musical solution.

Schoenberg’s 4 Part Puzzle Canon

Countless composers have fashioned puzzle canons, and that includes Arnold Schoenberg. Schoenberg had contacted Rudolph Ganz, pianist, composer, and music director of the St. Louis Symphony Orchestra and the Chicago Music College, about an academic opening. Although they could not reach an agreement, Schoenberg sent him a puzzle canon with the words,” It’s too bad that I ca n’t come to Chicago”. In this version, the perpetual canon is taken by a saxophone quartet.

For more of the best in classical music, for our E-Newsletter

Arnold Schoenberg: 4 Part Puzzle Canon for R. Ganz” Es ist zu dumm” ( Marcus Weiss, saxophone, Jean-Michel Goury, saxophone, Pierre-Stephane Meuge, saxophone, Sergio Bertocchi, saxophone, Jürg Henneberger, cond. )

Professional-Rata versus Consumer-Centric – Music Enterprise Analysis

Professional-Rata versus Consumer-Centric – Music Enterprise Analysis


As we noticed partially 14 of the collection on the streaming economic system, most music creators obtain so little income from streaming music that it’s economically irrelevant. To know this higher, we have to have a look at the accounting mechanism for music streaming revenues. The commonest mannequin is the pro-rata mannequin, which distributes income based on the market share of the rights holders. That is contrasted with the user-centric mannequin, the place precise utilization by streaming clients types the idea for distribution. This a part of the collection examines how these two programs work and the distributional results they’ve.

The Music Streaming Financial system – Half 15: Professional-Rata versus Consumer-Centric

Within the music streaming enterprise, the pro-rata distribution mannequin predominates. On this mannequin, the music streaming service calculates the overall month-to-month streaming income (after tax) based on the pricing fashions provided and retains an administrative share of round 30 per cent, as we’ve got already seen. The remaining complete quantity to be distributed to the rights holders (labels, music publishers, gathering societies, digital music distributors, and so on.) is split by the sum of all payment-relevant streams (greater than 30 seconds taking part in time) per thirty days. This worth is then multiplied by the repertoire shares attributable to the rights house owners, ensuing within the month-to-month cost quantity per rights holder. If this worth is larger than the upfront cost contractually agreed by the streaming service, the cash is distributed in that quantity. Nevertheless, if the distribution is lower than the contractually agreed upfront cost, the rights holder receives the upper quantity.[1] The distinction between the upfront cost and the precise payout is understood within the trade as ‘breakage’, however extra on that later.

The professional rata mannequin will be mathematically formulated as follows:[2]

RX … Income for streamed observe x

SX … Sum of all streamed tracks x

TS …  Whole variety of streams

RG … Whole streaming income

A really simplified instance illustrates how the royalty mannequin works. In 2022, the music “As It Was” by Harry Types was streamed round 2.9 billion instances (SX) on Spotify worldwide.[3] In the identical 12 months, a complete of 1,600 billion streams (TS)[4] had been recorded on Spotify and Spotify distributed round EUR 8.2 billion (RG) to all rights holders.[5] Making use of these figures to the system above, the share of the payout for “As It Was” is EUR 14 million. Harry Types is signed to the Sony label Columbia Data. If we add up all of the payouts for Harry Types’ songs and do the identical for all artists signed to Sony Music, we get the overall payout from Spotify to Sony Music Leisure. The funds should not calculated on a worldwide foundation, however individually for every nation, contemplating the completely different pricing fashions. Nevertheless, the simplified calculation ought to present how the cash collected by Spotify is distributed.

In his meta-study on the distribution of streaming revenues, Rasmus Rex Pedersen exhibits that within the pro-rata mannequin royalties are paid per stream, although customers pay a month-to-month flat fee, “which ends up in a cross-subsidization from low-streaming person to heavy-streaming person.”[6] He illustrates this with a extremely simplified mannequin based mostly on two customers, every of whom streams just one music, with completely different ranges of utilization depth (fig. 1).

Determine 1: Income distribution within the pro-rata mannequin

Supply: After Pedersen (2020, p 5)

Consumer 1 and person 2 pay the identical month-to-month subscription payment of EUR 10, with person 2 being an intensive person of music B with 90 streams per thirty days and person 1 solely often streaming music A with 10 streams per thirty days. Because the revenues of each customers are pooled within the pro-rata mannequin, after deducting the share for the music streaming service, considerably extra is distributed for music B than for music A. The aforementioned redistribution from occasional customers to intensive customers happens.

The Consumer-Centric-Mannequin

The user-centric mannequin has lengthy been mentioned as a substitute. Because the title suggests, this mannequin takes under consideration the listening habits of the customers and distributes based on utilization, as will be seen in fig. 2.

Determine 2: Income distribution within the user-centric mannequin

Supply: After Pedersen (2020, p 6)

Which means songs listened to are remunerated no matter streaming depth, with songs listened to intensively are value much less per stream. This is able to encourage area of interest repertoire as a result of the payout per stream can be larger. Followers would really feel that they’re paying for the musicians they like, which is seen as fairer.

The user-centric mannequin will be represented mathematically as follows:[7]

n   … Variety of all customers

RX … Income for streamed observe x

Si  … Variety of streams of observe x by person i

Ti  … Whole variety of streams by person i

Ri  … Income generated by person  i

The full income for a music is then calculated by including up all of the income from customers who streamed the music over a given interval.

Professional-Rata versus Consumer-Centric: The Research by Pedersen and Maasø

What would a change from the present pro-rata to a user-centric system imply for the distribution of music streaming revenues? Scientific research have already been performed on this, however they haven’t produced clear outcomes. In 2014, Rasmus Rex Pedersen performed a examine utilizing knowledge from the music streaming service WiMP (now Tidal) and highlighted that the user-centric mannequin wouldn’t change the distribution of revenue between probably the most streamed artists and people who serve a distinct segment. He even exhibits that within the section of the 5,000 most streamed artists, the user-centric mannequin would result in a redistribution in favour of the highest 100 artists. Solely home artists within the high 5,000 section would profit from the change, receiving 33.9 per cent as an alternative of 30.8 per cent of the streaming pie.[8]

Arnt Maasø got here to the same conclusion in 2014, utilizing the identical methodology and likewise WiMP knowledge for Norway, exhibiting that there can be just about no redistribution impact between high artists and fewer established artists if the pro-rata mannequin had been changed by the user-centred mannequin. Maasø additionally analysed redistribution results between main and unbiased labels, which aren’t statistically important. For Norway, nonetheless, there can be a redistribution from worldwide to native stars if the user-centred mannequin can be launched. Artists working in Norway would obtain greater than 1 / 4 of the streaming pie underneath the user-centred mannequin, as an alternative of the 22.5 per cent underneath the pro-rata mannequin.[9]

Professional-Rata versus Consumer-Centric: The Examine by Muikku

A examine performed by Pradeep Durgam of Aalto College on behalf of a number of music stakeholders in Finland, written and revealed by Jari Muikku in 2017, involves completely different conclusions than Pedersen and Maasø. Nevertheless, the Finnish examine relies on a distinct methodology, utilizing all streams (greater than 8 million) of Spotify Premium tier subscribers in March 2016 as an information foundation. From this, a random pattern of twenty-two,496 streams from 8,051 person IDs was drawn and analysed. The artists behind the streams had been divided into three teams. The highest group consisted of these artists who had greater than 100 streams in March 2016. This group represented 0.4 per cent of the pattern. The second group consisted of these artists who had between 10 and 99 streams per thirty days. This group represented 9.6 per cent of the pattern. This left 90 per cent of the artists within the third and lowest group, who didn’t obtain greater than 9 streams per thirty days. A comparability of the 2 cost fashions, professional rata and person centric, exhibits a statistically important distinction within the high group. Whereas artists on this group (greater than 100 streams per thirty days) had been capable of generate nearly 10 per cent of all income from music streaming, the income share for this group within the person centric mannequin was solely 5.6 per cent. Which means the pro-rata mannequin advantages high artists, whereas much less established artists have a tendency to learn extra from the user-centric mannequin. Nevertheless, the analysis of the second and third teams of artists doesn’t present clear outcomes for or in opposition to the user-centric mannequin, however the the examine’s writer nonetheless concludes that “the person centric mannequin offers extra direct energy to customers to focus on the cash they pay for the service to the artists or tracks they favour in contrast with the professional rata mannequin, which isn’t clear from their viewpoint.”[10]

Professional-Rata versus Consumer-Centric: The Examine by the Centre Nationwide de la Musique

The contradictory outcomes for Norway and Denmark on the one hand and Finland on the opposite are in all probability as a result of completely different analysis strategies used within the research. To be able to get a clearer image of the distributional results of the change from the pro-rata to the user-centred mannequin, the Centre Nationwide de la Musique commissioned a wide-ranging examine with knowledge from the 12 months 2019, analysing not solely the consequences of the change on the distribution of streaming revenues, but additionally on the range of music genres streamed and on streaming fraud. To this finish, the authors of the examine sought the cooperation of Spotify France and Deezer, however solely Deezer totally carried out the methodological necessities. Subsequently, the outcomes of the examine can solely be thought of legitimate for the Deezer knowledge. The primary and anticipated results of the French examine was that switching to the user-centric mannequin would lead to a large redistribution of Deezer’s streaming revenues from intensive customers to common and occasional customers. As an alternative of 69.2 per cent of all streaming revenues, heavy customers (3rd quartile) would contribute solely 31 per cent of the streaming pie within the user-centric mannequin. In distinction, common customers (between the 1st and threerd quartiles) would generate 61.7 per cent (as an alternative of 30.7 per cent within the pro-rata mannequin) and occasional customers (1st quartile) 7.3 per cent (as an alternative of 0.1 per cent) of complete streaming revenues. That is very believable as a result of, as we’ve got proven above, the pro-rata mannequin offers far more weight to heavy customers.[11]

Music titles from the again catalogue, i.e. songs which are older than 18 months after the discharge date, would additionally profit from the change to the user-centric mannequin. Whereas again catalogue titles can account for 48.9 per cent of streaming revenues underneath the pro-rata mannequin, this determine would rise to 52.1 per cent underneath the user-centric mannequin – a rise of three.2 share factors. The 5 largest rights holders of again catalogues would profit most from the change, receiving a share of 42.7 per cent of the streaming pie as an alternative of 39.6 per cent. Then again, the streaming share of the highest 5 rights holders for present music titles would fall from 40.5 per cent to 38.7 per cent. The underside line is that this might lead to solely a slight enhance of 0.8 share factors to a streaming income share of 88.5 per cent for the 5 largest rights holders. A change to the user-centric mannequin would imply a slight lack of 1.8 share factors for the home French repertoire, from 44.3 to 43.5 per cent.[12]

Nevertheless, the implementation of the user-centric mannequin would have the best impression on the distribution of revenues to artists. The change would lead to a redistribution of 17.2 per cent of revenues from the highest 10 artists on Deezer to the opposite classes, with the best enhance of +5.2 per cent going to artists outdoors the highest 10,000. In absolute figures, the redistribution impact is much more evident. The highest 10 artists would lose EUR 4.5 million in streaming income, which might correspond to a median lack of EUR 457,422 per artist. Of this, round EUR 810,000 would circulation to the artists within the group of the highest 11-100, who would obtain round EUR 9,000 extra per particular person. The group of high 101-1,000 artists would see the best enhance, with EUR 2.6 million, which might translate into a median of EUR 2,311 per particular person. EUR 348,000 would go to the highest 1,001-10,000, however they might obtain solely EUR 39 per particular person, and at last EUR 1.6 million would go to the artists outdoors the highest 10,000, however as a result of their massive quantity this might translate into revenue of lower than EUR 10 per particular person.[13]

Determine 3: The professional-rata and user-centric mannequin as compared

Supply: After Jari Muikku, 2017, p 24

Along with the revenue results, the French examine additionally calculated the impression on the range of music genres by altering the distribution mannequin. The authors of the examine recognized a complete of 28 completely different genres, with rap/hip-hop (25.8 per cent), pop (25.0 per cent) and rock (10.3 per cent) receiving the most important shares of the streaming pie within the pro-rata mannequin. The lengthy tail is made up of 21 genres that obtain not more than 3 per cent every, together with soul (2.2 per cent), jazz (1.1 per cent), steel (0.8 per cent) and classical music (0.7 per cent). Each pop and rock music would profit from a change to the user-centric distribution mannequin, with will increase of 13 per cent and 12 per cent respectively. Nevertheless, classical music would see the most important enhance at 25 per cent. Different area of interest genres would additionally profit from a change: blues (+18 per cent), disco (+17 per cent), jazz (+10 per cent) and people (+8 per cent). The largest loser within the user-centric mannequin can be rap/hip-hop, which might lose 40 per cent of all streaming revenues. The outcomes recommend that area of interest music might actually profit from a change, with pop/rock music additionally more likely to see progress, as a result of strengthening of the again catalogue, as seen above, by way of the user-centric mannequin.[14]

Lastly, the examine examined whether or not a change from pro-rata to user-centred distribution might cut back streaming abuse. The authors’ evaluation isn’t notably euphoric. Whereas the user-centric mannequin would cut back the traditional fraud of streaming farms that play sure music tracks across the clock, it could additionally create new alternatives for manipulation, corresponding to hacking into underused and inactive accounts that could possibly be used for fraudulent streaming.

The examine additionally assessed the prices of switching from the pro-rata to the user-centric mannequin, which was repeatedly cited as a counterargument.[15] Nevertheless, qualitative interviews with representatives from Spotify and Deezer revealed a blended image. Whereas Deezer representatives said that the present distribution mannequin might already present adequate funds for a change to the user-centric mannequin, Spotify interviewees estimated {that a} change would result in a rise in working prices of two to three per cent, which continues to be some huge cash in absolute phrases.[16]

SoundCloud’s Consumer-Centric-Mannequin

In observe, nonetheless, solely the German artist and streaming platform SoundCloud has to date launched the user-centric mannequin within the type of “fan-powered licence funds” on 1 April 2021. The SoundCloud FAQ web page explains how the mannequin works.[17] This cost mannequin is on the market to artists who’re instantly registered with SoundCloud within the “Premier Programme” or with “SoundCloud for Artists” (Subsequent Plus or Subsequent Professional subscriptions). As quickly as customers begin streaming their music, the artists obtain royalties based mostly on the listening time or the variety of adverts used. Using a paid subscription for SoundCloud Go+ additionally performs a job. Artists who fulfil the necessities and have a big fan base that streams their music intensively profit from the “fan-powered” licence funds. One 12 months on from the launch of the user-centric mannequin, SoundCloud has reviewed the scenario and introduced {that a} complete of 135,000 musicians have benefited from the ‘fan-powered’ mannequin. On common, these artists have earned 60 per cent extra underneath the brand new income mannequin than underneath the outdated pro-rata system. SoundCloud makes use of two examples – “Chevy” and “Vincent” – to reveal the rise in royalty funds. Chevy” obtained a median of 217 per cent extra in month-to-month distributions, whereas “Vincent” noticed his payout enhance from US $120 to US $600 per thirty days.[18] These are, after all, solely anecdotal values, however they help the examine outcomes revealed by the Centre Nationwide de la Musique for France.


Endnotes

[1] See Music Managers Discussion board (MMF), 2015, Dissecting the Digital Greenback, half 2. Ashford: Hartley Brothers, pp 22-24.

[2] See Rasmus Rex Pedersen, 2020, A Meta-Examine of Consumer-Centric Distribution for Music Streaming, Report of the Roskilde College, Denmark.

[3] See Wikipedia, “Listing of Spotify streaming information”, model of July 4, 2024, accessed: 2024-07-05.

[4] This determine is derived from the overall income that Spotify generated within the monetary 12 months 2022, divided by the common payout per stream of EUR 0.005. This leads to roughly 1.6 trillion streams generated by Spotify worldwide.

[5] The 30 per cent administration payment is deducted from the overall streaming income of EUR 11.7 billion (based on the 2022 annual report).

[6] Pedersen, 2020, p 3.

[7] Ibid., p 6.

[8] Rasmus Rex Pedersen, 2014, “Music Streaming In Denmark: An Evaluation of Listening Patterns and the Penalties of a per Consumer Settlement Mannequin Based mostly on Streaming Knowledge from WiMP”, Working Paper, Universität Roskilde.

[9] Arnt Maasø, 2014, “Consumer-centric settlement for music streaming: a report on the distribution of revenue from music streaming in Norway, based mostly on streaming knowledge from WiMP music”, Working Paper, Oslo College.

[10] Jari Muikku, 2017, Professional Rata and Consumer Centric Distribution Fashions: A Comparative Examine. Examine commissioned by Digital Media Finland, p 12.

[11] Ibid., p 22.

[12] Ibid., pp 22-23.

[13] Ibid., p 24.

[14] Ibid., pp 25-26.

[15] That is the road of argument used, for instance, by Will Web page, Director of Economics of Spotify und David Safir, Vice-President Worldwide of ASCAP within the Music & Copyright E-newsletter “Cash in, cash out: Classes from CMOs in allocating and distributing licensing income” of August 29, 2018.

[16] Muikku, 2017, ibid. pp 27-28.

[17] SoundCloud, “Fan-powered FAQs zu Lizenzzahlungen”, n.d., accessed: 2024-09-23.

[18] Music Enterprise Worldwide, “135,000 artists are actually getting paid by way of SoundCloud’s Fan-Powered Royalties platform”, April 26, 2022, accessed: 2024-09-23.

A Mix Solution of the Week is the Lauten Audio Rim Mount.

A Mix Solution of the Week is the Lauten Audio Rim Mount.

Rim Mount, a compact disc microphone mounting system that can be used on the disc of almost any drum, has been released by Lauten Audio.

Rim Mount, a compact disc microphone mounting system that can be used on the disc of almost any drum, was recently unveiled by Lauten Audio in New York, New York, in 2024. The gadget, which replaces bulky microphone stands, has a shock-absorbing design with a fully presenting finger that enables a user to quickly install and adjust the position of a variety of microphones. It also has a shock-absorbent design.

The Rim Mount was perfected for Lauten Audio’s Catch Mic and Tom Mic, but is extremely effective for mounting industry-standard microphone such as the SM57, MD421 and C414.

Rim Mount’s non-marring style shields drum shells, hoops, and heads from possible harm from metal-on-metal contact, avoiding the failing points, sagging, or buzzing issues that are frequently encountered with standard “magic arm”-style drum mic mounts. It uses a single lever to lock the camera into place and has the decoupling properties of a camera stand. The support should not be wrenched into area, according to Lauten Audio, and it is suggested that firm-finger strengthening.

Steven Slate Audio VSX — A Mix Real-World Review

Rim Mount is compatible with most disc suspension systems, including DW’s Suspension Tom Mount, Pearl’s Optimount, Gretsch’s GTS Tom Suspension, and others. It can be used on drums that have metal or wood basket, though Lauten Audio advises prudence when mounting large speakers on any wood basket.

Rim Mount was field tested in productions and on journey by some of the most difficult drummers to maintain a reliable performance no matter what the application.

It is available now at an MSRP of$ 129 and is covered by a three-year limited warranty.

Talk to &quot, feel U babe Me, &quot, the First Single From Knock2&#039, s Long-Awaited Debut Album

Talk to &quot, feel U babe Me, &quot, the First Single From Knock2&#039, s Long-Awaited Debut Album

Back of his long-awaited album song, NOLIMIT, Knock2 is not-so-ironically pushing the limits of his craft with its result one, “feel U lover Me”.

The scintillating record, which is now available via 88rising, was first teased in his shows at HARD Summer and Lollapalooza and quickly gained popularity as a sought-after discharge as EDM.com’s Class of 2023 celebrity grew in popularity.

@knock2music

i may think that u luv me b child ahh #knock2 #electronicmusic #rave #musicfestival #edm #livemusic

♬ unique sound- Knock2music

High-energy guitar house and pleasant vocals are combined in “feel U lover Me,” propelling through a kind of infectiously active chord progression that has become a hallmark of Knock2’s distinct style. The test of” TBH,” a song by PARTYNEXTDOOR, has been expertly pitched and interpolated to give the track a new spin that seamlessly blends into the track’s bouncy groove.

Knock2 says the circuit’s roots can be traced again to a cafe music production program alongside his ISOKNOCK bandmate, ISOxo.

” I was making a fresh opening for 2023 events, sampling my beloved R&amp, B actor, PARTYNEXTDOOR, and that’s how the music came to life”, Knock2 said in a press release. It fast became one of my striking lines as soon as I began playing it reside. Given that so many viewers currently know and adore it, I’m eager to share it with the world.

Viewers may experience live-awesome Me at upcoming ISOKNOCK shows in San Diego and San Francisco, where the Coachella legends are scheduled to perform for more than 50 000 people. According to the press release, performances may also feature different unpublished songs from Knock2’s NOLIMIT album. They were organized in support of their creative album 4EVR.

Find the new one on streaming platforms around and talk to “feel U luv Me” above.

Follow Knock2:

X: x.com/knock2music
Instagram: instagram.com/knock2music
TikTok: tiktok.com/@knock2music
Spotify: spoti.fi/3OHeylI


Sony Artists Can Now Get Free Guidance, Career Support

Sony Artists Can Now Get Free Guidance, Career Support

Dear Sony Music Partner,

Sony Music Entertainment today announced the growth of Artists Forward, our innovative initiative that prioritizes complete support for music creators throughout their professional development.

With a new system called Artist Assistance, we are now furthering our responsibility to our energetic roster musicians by expanding our late announced Legacy Unrecouped Balance Program, which provides many of our long-standing designers and individuals without regard to their recoupment position. This is a large, global work intended to promote wellness for our talented talent and provide them with appropriate information and essential resources for their careers.

Actor Assistance launches immediately starting with access to free, private counselling services to handle stress, stress, depression, anguish, family and relationship matters and more. Use of the system is entirely private, and active roster musicians around the world you connect with a dedicated, licensed counselor at no cost. Artists can access these resources by emailing ( EMAIL REDACTED ) to schedule a consultation and assess support requirements. ( Further details are included. )

Plus, many artists signed in the U. S. are entitled to access qualification health care and pensions services accessible through Sony Music’s associations with leading performer organizations, such as unions representing U. S. artists. For answers to questions about which organizations offer what benefits, and how to contact them, U. S. artists may email ( EMAIL REDACTED ). Opportunities for comparable products in various nations are also being looked at.

Working closely with our Sony Audio names and businesses around the world, we have appointed experienced music industry executive Susan Moultrie as Senior Vice President of Artist Initiatives and Business Administration to function as the program’s principal place of cooperation. This new position will be in charge of creating and implementing additional services that will improve the transparency and support for our artists.

For instance, we are developing a global program for newly signed artists to give them more information and resources about joining the Sony Music roster as well as best practices to maximize the promotion and success of their releases. It will cover a variety of subjects, including how Sony Music collaborates with its artists to secure digital partners for music, how to prevent pre-release leaks, and how to avoid last-minute creative changes due to clearance issues, among others.

Additionally, we will further enhance our resources focused on answering artist and participant questions around earnings statements, payments, and how Sony Music’s Artist Portal and data analytics tools work.